These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10898848)

  • 21. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of four transfer impression techniques for dental implants: a scanning electron microscopic analysis.
    Yamamoto E; Marotti J; de Campos TT; Neto PT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1115-24. PubMed ID: 21197487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion.
    Assunção WG; Cardoso A; Gomes EA; Tabata LF; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):641-7. PubMed ID: 19090889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment.
    Kuo SB; Hong HH; Tsai TP; Shen YF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12488861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants.
    Ongül D; Gökçen-Röhlig B; Şermet B; Keskin H
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Jun; 57(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 22624759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A modified impression technique for implant-supported restoration.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Nissan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jun; 71(6):589-91. PubMed ID: 8040821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A technique for verifying implant analog positions in the definitive cast.
    Sadid-Zadeh R; O'Neal SJ; Liu PR; Aponte-Wesson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 23522369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of splinting implant impression techniques: two dimensional analyses.
    Tarib NA; Seong TW; Chuen KM; Kun MS; Ahmad M; Kamarudin KH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 22474935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fabrication of a cast-based implant surgical guide using guide sleeves.
    George FM; Chan HL; Razzoog ME; Oh TJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):409-12. PubMed ID: 22133398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An investigation of heat transfer to the implant-bone interface related to exothermic heat generation during setting of autopolymerizing acrylic resins applied directly to an implant abutment.
    Ormianer Z; Laufer BZ; Nissan J; Gross M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):837-42. PubMed ID: 11151583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The O-ring universal impression technique.
    Hussaini S
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):599-600. PubMed ID: 18761567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of impression accuracy for implant at various angulations.
    Assunção WG; Britto RC; Ricardo Barão VA; Delben JA; dos Santos PH
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 20386220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The utilization of a preprosthetic extraoral verification stent for dental implant-supported reconstructions.
    Silverstein LH; Kurtzman GM; Schneider A; Shatz PC
    Dent Today; 2002 Jan; 21(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 11824123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques.
    de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Custom copings for accurate impressions of multiple internal connection implants.
    Ntounis A; Pelekanos S
    Implant Dent; 2010 Oct; 19(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 20881806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Immediate loading in conometric prosthodontics--the Cagliari technique: two case reports.
    Caruso G; Cattaneo A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Feb; 28(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18351200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intrasurgical implant position transfer and interim restoration placement.
    Sava CN; Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Orfanou AV
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):648-53. PubMed ID: 18798785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modified custom tray.
    Ortensi L; Strocchi ML
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 10946346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of impression coping splinting on the accuracy of the open-tray technique.
    Kavadia V; Kourtis S; Zoidis P; Sarafianou A
    Gen Dent; 2019; 67(3):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 31199752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.