These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10898878)

  • 21. Contact- and contact-free wear between various resin composites.
    Osiewicz MA; Werner A; Pytko-Polonczyk J; Roeters FJ; Kleverlaan CJ
    Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 25498520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
    Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Influences of composition on brush wear of composite resins. Influences of particle size and content of filler].
    Yuasa S
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Jul; 9(4):659-78. PubMed ID: 2134832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Relationship between subsurface damage and wear of dental restorative composites.
    McKinney JE; Wu W
    J Dent Res; 1982 Sep; 61(9):1083-8. PubMed ID: 6963283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of artificial saliva on abrasive wear and microhardness of dental composites filled with nanoparticles.
    Mayworm CD; Camargo SS; Bastian FL
    J Dent; 2008 Sep; 36(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 18554772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In-vitro and in-vivo wear profile of composite resins.
    Satou N; Khan AM; Satou K; Satou J; Shintani H; Wakasa K; Yamaki M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Jan; 19(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 1316435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two-body wear simulation influence on some direct and indirect dental resin biocomposites - A qualitative analysis.
    Caracostea A; Morar N; Florea A; Soanca A; Badea ME
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2016; 18(3):61-72. PubMed ID: 27840440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop.
    Mair LH; Stolarski TA; Vowles RW; Lloyd CH
    J Dent; 1996; 24(1-2):141-8. PubMed ID: 8636486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro abrasion of resin-coated highly viscous glass ionomer cements: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.
    Kanik Ö; Turkun LS; Dasch W
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):821-829. PubMed ID: 27073101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Erosion and abrasion of tooth-colored restorative materials and human enamel.
    Yu H; Wegehaupt FJ; Wiegand A; Roos M; Attin T; Buchalla W
    J Dent; 2009 Dec; 37(12):913-22. PubMed ID: 19674824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear.
    Lazaridou D; Belli R; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1485-92. PubMed ID: 25491442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Oscillatory wear tests of dental composites.
    Pilliar RM; Smith DC; Maric B
    J Dent Res; 1984 Sep; 63(9):1166-72. PubMed ID: 6589282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vitro wear gap formation of self-adhesive resin cements: a CLSM evaluation.
    Belli R; Pelka M; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
    J Dent; 2009 Dec; 37(12):984-93. PubMed ID: 19699255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Abrasion resistance of direct and indirect resins as a function of a sealant veneer.
    Ferraz Caneppele TM; Rocha DM; Màximo Araujo MA; Valera MC; Salazar Marocho SM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 25098999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of filler size and filler loading on wear of experimental flowable resin composites.
    Shinkai K; Taira Y; Suzuki S; Kawashima S; Suzuki M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Feb; 26():e20160652. PubMed ID: 29412366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Corrosive effect of topical fluoride agents on surfaces of five composite resins].
    Jian YT; Ling JQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 42(11):693-7. PubMed ID: 18307931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Subsurface degradation of resin-based composites.
    Bagheri R; Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    Dent Mater; 2007 Aug; 23(8):944-51. PubMed ID: 16996586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A study of surfaces developed on composite resins in vivo during 4.5 years; observations by SEM.
    Xu HC; Tong W; Vingerling PA; Song SQ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1989 Jul; 16(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 2795317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Wear resistance of a modified polymethyl methacrylate artificial tooth compared to five commercially available artificial tooth materials.
    Kamonwanon P; Yodmongkol S; Chantarachindawong R; Thaweeboon S; Thaweeboon B; Srikhirin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 25882971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of topical fluoride agents on the morphologic characteristics and composition of resin composite restorative materials.
    Papagiannoulis L; Tzoutzas J; Eliades G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Apr; 77(4):405-13. PubMed ID: 9104718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.