These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Ambiguous encoding of stimuli by primary sensory afferents causes a lack of independence in the perception of multiple stimulus attributes. Carlson BA; Kawasaki M J Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 26(36):9173-83. PubMed ID: 16957074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of sensing behavior on a latency code. Sawtell NB; Williams A; Roberts PD; von der Emde G; Bell CC J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 26(32):8221-34. PubMed ID: 16899717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Information rate and spike-timing precision of proprioceptive afferents. DiCaprio RA; Billimoria CP; Ludwar BCh J Neurophysiol; 2007 Sep; 98(3):1706-17. PubMed ID: 17634343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The spatial structure of stimuli shapes the timescale of correlations in population spiking activity. Litwin-Kumar A; Chacron MJ; Doiron B PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(9):e1002667. PubMed ID: 23028274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Inhibition evoked from primary afferents in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of the weakly electric fish (Apteronotus leptorhynchus). Berman NJ; Maler L J Neurophysiol; 1998 Dec; 80(6):3173-96. PubMed ID: 9862915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A simple model of long-term spike train regularization. Brandman R; Nelson ME Neural Comput; 2002 Jul; 14(7):1575-97. PubMed ID: 12079547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Precision of the pacemaker nucleus in a weakly electric fish: network versus cellular influences. Moortgat KT; Bullock TH; Sejnowski TJ J Neurophysiol; 2000 Feb; 83(2):971-83. PubMed ID: 10669509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spike-frequency adaptation separates transient communication signals from background oscillations. Benda J; Longtin A; Maler L J Neurosci; 2005 Mar; 25(9):2312-21. PubMed ID: 15745957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Limits of linear rate coding of dynamic stimuli by electroreceptor afferents. Gussin D; Benda J; Maler L J Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 97(4):2917-29. PubMed ID: 17287436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Estimating receptive fields in the presence of spike-time jitter. Gollisch T Network; 2006 Jun; 17(2):103-29. PubMed ID: 16818393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Encoding of information into neural spike trains in an auditory nerve fiber model with electric stimuli in the presence of a pseudospontaneous activity. Mino H IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Mar; 54(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 17355047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Which spike train distance is most suitable for distinguishing rate and temporal coding? Satuvuori E; Kreuz T J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Apr; 299():22-33. PubMed ID: 29462713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nature and precision of temporal coding in visual cortex: a metric-space analysis. Victor JD; Purpura KP J Neurophysiol; 1996 Aug; 76(2):1310-26. PubMed ID: 8871238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spatiotemporal burst coding for extracting features of spatiotemporally varying stimuli. Fujita K; Kashimori Y; Kambara T Biol Cybern; 2007 Oct; 97(4):293-305. PubMed ID: 17805559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]