These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10900738)

  • 1. [Electronic detection of breaks in the surgeon-patient barrier. Evaluation of protective clothing in visceral surgery].
    Caillot JL; Côte C; Lemaire C; Fabry J
    Ann Chir; 2000 May; 125(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 10900738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electronic evaluation of the value of double gloving.
    Caillot JL; Côte C; Abidi H; Fabry J
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1387-90. PubMed ID: 10583283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgeon-patient barrier efficiency monitored with an electronic device in three surgical settings.
    Hentz VR; Stephanides M; Boraldi A; Tessari R; Isani R; Cadossi R; Biscione R; Massari L; Traina GC
    World J Surg; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1101-8. PubMed ID: 11571942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.
    Thomas S; Agarwal M; Mehta G
    Postgrad Med J; 2001 Jul; 77(909):458-60. PubMed ID: 11423598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anticipated detection of imminent surgeon-patient barrier breaches. A prospective randomized controlled trial using an indicator underglove system.
    Caillot JL; Paparel P; Arnal E; Schreiber V; Voiglio EJ
    World J Surg; 2006 Jan; 30(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 16369716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How often does glove perforation occur in surgery? Comparison between single gloves and a double-gloving system.
    Laine T; Aarnio P
    Am J Surg; 2001 Jun; 181(6):564-6. PubMed ID: 11513787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.
    Tanner J; Parkinson H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (3):CD003087. PubMed ID: 12137673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical investigation of glove-gown interface barrier performance in simulated surgical settings.
    Kahveci Z; Selcen Kilinc-Balci F; Yorio PL
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Jul; 16(7):498-506. PubMed ID: 31021715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing the risk of viral transmission at operation by electronic monitoring of the surgeon-patient barrier.
    Macintyre IM; Currie JS; Smith DN; Anderson ID; Cadossi R
    Br J Surg; 1994 Jul; 81(7):1076-8. PubMed ID: 7922071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery.
    Guo YP; Wong PM; Li Y; Or PP
    Am J Surg; 2012 Aug; 204(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 22342011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glove perforation rate in vascular surgery--a comparison between single and double gloving.
    Aarnio P; Laine T
    Vasa; 2001 May; 30(2):122-4. PubMed ID: 11417282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glove and gown effects on intraoperative bacterial contamination.
    Ward WG; Cooper JM; Lippert D; Kablawi RO; Neiberg RH; Sherertz RJ
    Ann Surg; 2014 Mar; 259(3):591-7. PubMed ID: 24045444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective randomized assessment of single versus double-gloving for general surgical procedures.
    Na'aya HU; Madziga AG; Eni UE
    Niger J Med; 2009; 18(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 19485153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence of glove perforations in gastrointestinal surgery and the protective effect of double gloves: a prospective, randomised controlled study.
    Naver LP; Gottrup F
    Eur J Surg; 2000 Apr; 166(4):293-5. PubMed ID: 10817324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Glove Perforation Rate in Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled Study To Evaluate the Efficacy of Double Gloving.
    Makama JG; Okeme IM; Makama EJ; Ameh EA
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2016 Aug; 17(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 26981792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of double versus single gloving in protecting the operating team.
    Gani JS; Anseline PF; Bissett RL
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1990 Mar; 60(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 2327922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: are we safe enough?
    Malhotra M; Sharma JB; Wadhwa L; Arora R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Aug; 30(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 15238110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized controlled trial of glove perforation in single- and double-gloving in episiotomy repair after vaginal delivery.
    Punyatanasakchai P; Chittacharoen A; Ayudhya NI
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):354-7. PubMed ID: 15327447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency of glove perforation and the protective effect of double gloves in gynecological surgery.
    Murta EF; Silva CS; Júnior OR
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 268(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 12768294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Double gloving and a glove perforation indication system during the dental treatment of HIV-positive patients: are they necessary?
    Avery CM; Gallagher P; Birnbaum W
    Br Dent J; 1999 Jan; 186(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 10028739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.