147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10900760)
1. [Determination of NMP-22 as recurrence marker in bladder cancer. Preliminary study].
Pérez García FJ; Escaf Barmadah S; Fernández Gómez JM; Rodríguez Martínez JJ; Martín Benito JL
Arch Esp Urol; 2000 May; 53(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 10900760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [NMP-22 test. Is it useful in the follow-up of patients with superficial bladder tumor?].
Pérez García FJ; Eyo A; Escaf Barmadah S; Fernández Gómez JM
Arch Esp Urol; 2002 Dec; 55(10):1201-8. PubMed ID: 12611217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of nuclear matrix protein-22 as a clinical diagnostic marker for bladder cancer.
Chang YH; Wu CH; Lee YL; Huang PH; Kao YL; Shiau MY
Urology; 2004 Oct; 64(4):687-92. PubMed ID: 15491702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical application of NMP22 in the management of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.
Sawczuk IS; Bagiella E; Sawczuk AT; Yun EJ
Cancer Detect Prev; 2000; 24(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 11059567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nuclear matrix protein 22 as adjunct to urine cytology and cystoscopy in follow-up of superficial TCC of urinary bladder.
Gupta NP; Sharma N; Kumar R
Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):592-6; discussion 596-7. PubMed ID: 19168205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk stratification for bladder tumor recurrence, stage and grade by urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 and cytology.
Shariat SF; Casella R; Wians FH; Ashfaq R; Balko J; Sulser T; Gasser TC; Sagalowsky AI
Eur Urol; 2004 Mar; 45(3):304-13; author reply 313. PubMed ID: 15036675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative predictive values of urinary cytology, urinary bladder cancer antigen, CYFRA 21-1 and NMP22 for evaluating symptomatic patients at risk for bladder cancer.
Sánchez-Carbayo M; Urrutia M; Silva JM; Romaní R; De Buitrago JM; Navajo JA
J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1462-7. PubMed ID: 11342897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Urinary BTA-TRAK in the follow-up of superficial transitional-cell bladder carcinoma].
Fernández Gómez JM; García Rodríguez J; Escaf Barmadah S; Raigoso P; Rodríguez Martínez JJ; Allende MT; Casasola Chamorro J; Rodríguez Faba O; Martín Benito JL; Regadera Sejas FJ
Arch Esp Urol; 2002; 55(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 11957750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neural network using combined urine nuclear matrix protein-22, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and urinary intercellular adhesion molecule-1 to detect bladder cancer.
Parekattil SJ; Fisher HA; Kogan BA
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):917-20. PubMed ID: 12576812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surveillance of patients with bladder carcinoma using fluorescent in-situ hybridization on bladder washings.
Bergman J; Reznichek RC; Rajfer J
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 17850364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of NMP22 BladderChek test and urine cytology for the detection of recurrent bladder cancer.
Kumar A; Kumar R; Gupta NP
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2006 Mar; 36(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 16520358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Four bladder tumor markers have a disappointingly low sensitivity for small size and low grade recurrence.
Boman H; Hedelin H; Holmäng S
J Urol; 2002 Jan; 167(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 11743280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. NMP22: a sensitive, cost-effective test in patients at risk for bladder cancer.
Zippe C; Pandrangi L; Potts JM; Kursh E; Novick A; Agarwal A
Anticancer Res; 1999; 19(4A):2621-3. PubMed ID: 10470205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative study of BTA stat test, NMP-22, and cytology in the diagnosis of bladder cancer].
Gutiérrez Baños JL; Rebollo Rodrigo MH; Antolín Juarez F; Martín García B; Hernández Rodríguez R; Portillo Martín JA; Correas Gómez MA; del Valle Schaan JI; Roca Edreira A; de Diego Rodríguez E; Radó Velázquez MA
Arch Esp Urol; 2000; 53(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 10730421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Screening methods in the detection of bladder cancer: comparison of nuclear matrix protein-22, bladder tumor antigen and cytological examinations].
Fukui Y; Samma S; Fujimoto K; Akiyama T; Yamaguchi A; Hirayama A
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2001 May; 47(5):311-4. PubMed ID: 11433750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening and monitoring for bladder cancer: refining the use of NMP22.
Ponsky LE; Sharma S; Pandrangi L; Kedia S; Nelson D; Agarwal A; Zippe CD
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 11435827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. NMP-22, urinary cytology, and cystoscopy: a 1 year comparison study.
Schlake A; Crispen PL; Cap AP; Atkinson T; Davenport D; Preston DM
Can J Urol; 2012 Aug; 19(4):6345-50. PubMed ID: 22892257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of urine CYFRA 21-1 for the detection of primary and recurrent bladder carcinoma.
Nisman B; Barak V; Shapiro A; Golijanin D; Peretz T; Pode D
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 94(11):2914-22. PubMed ID: 12115379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Urinary cytology and quantitative BTA and UBC tests in surveillance of patients with pTapT1 bladder urothelial carcinoma.
Babjuk M; Soukup V; Pesl M; Kostírová M; Drncová E; Smolová H; Szakacsová M; Getzenberg R; Pavlík I; Dvorácek J
Urology; 2008 Apr; 71(4):718-22. PubMed ID: 18387400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Urinary CYFRA 21.1 is not a useful marker for the detection of recurrences in the follow-up of superficial bladder cancer.
Fernandez-Gomez J; Rodríguez-Martínez JJ; Barmadah SE; García Rodríguez J; Allende DM; Jalon A; Gonzalez R; Alvarez-Múgica M
Eur Urol; 2007 May; 51(5):1267-74. PubMed ID: 17207912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
