292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10904098)
1. MCF10DCIS.com xenograft model of human comedo ductal carcinoma in situ.
Miller FR; Santner SJ; Tait L; Dawson PJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jul; 92(14):1185-6. PubMed ID: 10904098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic stromal-epithelial interactions during progression of MCF10DCIS.com xenografts.
Tait LR; Pauley RJ; Santner SJ; Heppner GH; Heng HH; Rak JW; Miller FR
Int J Cancer; 2007 May; 120(10):2127-34. PubMed ID: 17266026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. IL-6-mediated cross-talk between human preadipocytes and ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer progression.
Kim HS; Jung M; Choi SK; Woo J; Piao YJ; Hwang EH; Kim H; Kim SJ; Moon WK
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Aug; 37(1):200. PubMed ID: 30134951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comedo-ductal carcinoma in situ: A paradoxical role for programmed cell death.
Shekhar MP; Tait L; Pauley RJ; Wu GS; Santner SJ; Nangia-Makker P; Shekhar V; Nassar H; Visscher DW; Heppner GH; Miller FR
Cancer Biol Ther; 2008 Nov; 7(11):1774-82. PubMed ID: 18787417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytochrome c1 in ductal carcinoma in situ of breast associated with proliferation and comedo necrosis.
Chishiki M; Takagi K; Sato A; Miki Y; Yamamoto Y; Ebata A; Shibahara Y; Watanabe M; Ishida T; Sasano H; Suzuki T
Cancer Sci; 2017 Jul; 108(7):1510-1519. PubMed ID: 28394473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An intraductal human-in-mouse transplantation model mimics the subtypes of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Behbod F; Kittrell FS; LaMarca H; Edwards D; Kerbawy S; Heestand JC; Young E; Mukhopadhyay P; Yeh HW; Allred DC; Hu M; Polyak K; Rosen JM; Medina D
Breast Cancer Res; 2009; 11(5):R66. PubMed ID: 19735549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nuclear grade and comedo necrosis of ductal carcinoma in situ as histopathological eligible criteria for the Japan Clinical Oncology Group 1505 trial: an interobserver agreement study.
Tsuda H; Yoshida M; Akiyama F; Ohi Y; Kinowaki K; Kumaki N; Kondo Y; Saito A; Sasaki E; Nishimura R; Fujii S; Homma K; Horii R; Murata Y; Itami M; Kajita S; Kato H; Kurosumi M; Sakatani T; Shimizu S; Taniguchi K; Tamiya S; Nakamura H; Kanbayashi C; Shien T; Iwata H
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2021 Mar; 51(3):434-443. PubMed ID: 33420502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Different Biological Action of Oleic Acid in ALDHhigh and ALDHlow Subpopulations Separated from Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of Breast Cancer.
Kim HS; Jung M; Choi SK; Moon WK; Kim SJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0160835. PubMed ID: 27589390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability in diagnostic threshold for comedo necrosis among breast pathologists: implications for patient eligibility for active surveillance trials of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Harrison BT; Hwang ES; Partridge AH; Thompson AM; Schnitt SJ
Mod Pathol; 2019 Sep; 32(9):1257-1262. PubMed ID: 30980039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mouse intraductal modeling of primary ductal carcinoma in situ.
Hutten SJ; Behbod F; Scheele CLGJ; Jonkers J
STAR Protoc; 2023 Sep; 4(3):102526. PubMed ID: 37651235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The risk of occult invasive breast cancer after excisional biopsy showing in-situ ductal carcinoma of comedo pattern.
Hardman PD; Worth A; Lee U; Baird RM
Can J Surg; 1989 Jan; 32(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 2535949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computational model of ductal carcinoma in situ: the effects of contact inhibition on pattern formation.
Shumate SD; El-Shenawee M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 56(5):1341-7. PubMed ID: 19272932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elastic stains in the evaluation of DCIS with comedo necrosis in breast cancers.
Zombori T; Cserni G
Virchows Arch; 2018 Jun; 472(6):1007-1014. PubMed ID: 29101458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The comedo subtype of intraductal carcinoma. Cytologic characteristics.
Lilleng R; Hagmar B
Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 1316029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ductal carcinoma in situ: detection, diagnosis, and characterization with magnetic resonance imaging.
Jansen SA
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):306-18. PubMed ID: 21782121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):483-5. PubMed ID: 1323923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Polyphenolics from mango (Mangifera indica L.) suppress breast cancer ductal carcinoma in situ proliferation through activation of AMPK pathway and suppression of mTOR in athymic nude mice.
Nemec MJ; Kim H; Marciante AB; Barnes RC; Hendrick ED; Bisson WH; Talcott ST; Mertens-Talcott SU
J Nutr Biochem; 2017 Mar; 41():12-19. PubMed ID: 27951515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrastructure of the periductal area of comedo carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Tang P; Teichberg S; Roberts B; Hajdu SI
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2001 Jul; 31(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 11508833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mathematical modelling of comedo ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Franks SJ; Byrne HM; Mudhar HS; Underwood JC; Lewis CE
Math Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 20(3):277-308. PubMed ID: 14667048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary human breast carcinomas transplantable in the nude mouse.
Sebesteny A; Taylor-Papadimitriou J; Ceriani R; Millis R; Schmitt C; Trevan D
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1979 Dec; 63(6):1331-7. PubMed ID: 92586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
