BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10905033)

  • 1. [Short-latency auditory evoked potentials during a change in the physical parameter of a sound stimulus].
    Khachunts AS; Vaganian LG; Bagdasarian RA; Tatevosian NE; Tatevosian IG; Kostanian EG; Manasian KA; Bilian RN
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2000; 26(3):48-53. PubMed ID: 10905033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The spectral characteristics of short-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Khachunts AS; Vaganian LG; Bagdasarian RA; Tatevosian NE; Tatevosian IG; Kostanian EG; Bilian RN; Manasian KA
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2000; 26(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 10752302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Reverse adaptation studied by recording short-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Petrov SM; Pudov AI
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1998; 24(4):71-4. PubMed ID: 9778900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory N1 as a change-related automatic response.
    Nishihara M; Inui K; Motomura E; Otsuru N; Ushida T; Kakigi R
    Neurosci Res; 2011 Oct; 71(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 21787811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
    Salajegheh A; Link A; Elster C; Burghoff M; Sander T; Trahms L; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Reflection of the effect of binaural release from masking in human long-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Vaĭtulevich SF; Mal'tseva NF
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1987; 13(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 3582841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel type of auditory responses: temporal dynamics of 40-Hz steady-state responses induced by changes in sound localization.
    Ross B
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1265-77. PubMed ID: 18632891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans.
    Mäkinen V; May P; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):701-6. PubMed ID: 14980572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evoked cortical activity to sounds of differing signal meaning in young and elderly subjects].
    Kostandov EA; Zakharova NN; Pogrebinskiĭ SA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1989; 39(5):803-12. PubMed ID: 2603547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus induced reset of 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses.
    Ross B; Herdman AT; Pantev C
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():21. PubMed ID: 16012609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of P50 auditory sensory gating measures in infants during active sleep.
    Hunter SK; Corral N; Ponicsan H; Ross RG
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jan; 19(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 18281897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The effect on man of weak-intensity acoustic signals].
    Tarakanov PV; Aronov IB
    Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 1990; 26(6):779-86. PubMed ID: 2092560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The process of distinguishing the pitch of sounds and auditory evoked potentials].
    Karaichev KI; Samoĭlovich LA; Mikhalevskaia MB; Finkel' NV
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1988; 14(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 3169427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evoked cortical activity to the varying probability of significant stimuli in healthy subjects and alcoholics].
    Genkina OA; Shostakovich GS; Kurella B
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1990; 16(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 2358152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vestibular evoked potentials (VsEPs) in patients with severe to profound bilateral hearing loss.
    Rosengren SM; Colebatch JG
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 May; 117(5):1145-53. PubMed ID: 16497555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sound level dependence of auditory evoked potentials: simultaneous EEG recording and low-noise fMRI.
    Thaerig S; Behne N; Schadow J; Lenz D; Scheich H; Brechmann A; Herrmann CS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Mar; 67(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 17707939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The effect of the rate of movement of a sound image on human long-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Vaĭtulevich SF; Pak SP
    Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 1990; 26(6):772-8. PubMed ID: 2092559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occasional changes in sound location enhance middle latency evoked responses.
    Sonnadara RR; Alain C; Trainor LJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):187-92. PubMed ID: 16487494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Magnetic fields evoked by auditory stimuli: a normative study].
    Maurizi M; Corina L; Del Gratta C; Galli J; Paludetti G; Pasquarelli A; Pellini R; Peresson M; Pizzella V; Romani GL
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1992; 12(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 1632267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.