These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10907321)

  • 1. Determining cost savings from attempted cephalic version in an inner city delivering population.
    Adams EK; Mauldin PD; Mauldin JG; Mayberry RM
    Health Care Manag Sci; 2000 Jun; 3(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 10907321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation.
    Tan JM; Macario A; Carvalho B; Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2010 Jan; 10():3. PubMed ID: 20092630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A decision analytical cost analysis of offering ECV in a UK district general hospital.
    James M; Hunt K; Burr R; Johanson R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2001; 1():6. PubMed ID: 11472641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brief report: a cost analysis of neuraxial anesthesia to facilitate external cephalic version for breech fetal presentation.
    Carvalho B; Tan JM; Macario A; El-Sayed YY; Sultan P
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Jul; 117(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 23592608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.
    Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Ford JB
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 28747173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.
    de Gregorio N; Friedl T; Schramm A; Reister F; Janni W; Ebner F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(5):477-481. PubMed ID: 28848185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253 women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses.
    Hutton EK; Simioni JC; Thabane L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Aug; 96(8):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28449212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Fewer caesarean sections for breech presentation following external cephalic version according to a protocol in a special office visit].
    Kuppens SM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Huibers M; Franssen MJ; de Becker BM; Wijnen HA; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jun; 152(23):1323-8. PubMed ID: 18661859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Matched cohort study of external cephalic version in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Keepanasseril A; Anand K; Soundara Raghavan S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jul; 138(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 28380246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of breech version by acupuncture-type interventions on BL 67, including moxibustion, for women with a breech foetus at 33 weeks gestation: a modelling approach.
    van den Berg I; Kaandorp GC; Bosch JL; Duvekot JJ; Arends LR; Hunink MG
    Complement Ther Med; 2010 Apr; 18(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 20430289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. External cephalic version in singleton pregnancies at term: a retrospective analysis.
    Zeck W; Walcher W; Lang U
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2008; 66(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 18230911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The implementation of external cephalic version at term for singleton breech presentation--how can we further increase its impact?
    Lau TK; Lo KW; Wan D; Rogers MS
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Nov; 37(4):393-6. PubMed ID: 9429699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Significance of success rate of external cephalic versions and vaginal breech deliveries in counseling women with breech presentation at term.
    Ezra Y; Elram T; Plotkin V; Elchalal U
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2000 May; 90(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 10767512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section.
    Hussin OA; Mahmoud MA; Abdel-Fattah MM
    East Mediterr Health J; 2013 Feb; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 23516827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery.
    Sela HY; Fiegenberg T; Ben-Meir A; Elchalal U; Ezra Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Feb; 142(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19019528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementation of external cephalic version in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.
    Vlemmix F; Rosman AN; te Hoven S; van de Berg S; Fleuren MA; Rijnders ME; Beuckens A; Opmeer BC; Mol BW; Kok M
    Birth; 2014 Dec; 41(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 25288341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term.
    Hutton EK; Hofmeyr GJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jan; (1):CD000084. PubMed ID: 16437421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: Cost analysis.
    Yamasato K; Kaneshiro B; Salcedo J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1023-31. PubMed ID: 25771920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
    Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reductions in cost and cesarean rate by routine use of external cephalic version: a decision analysis.
    Gifford DS; Keeler E; Kahn KL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 85(6):930-6. PubMed ID: 7770262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.