These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10908173)
41. Assessing the risk of induction of skin sensitization to plant protection products: A quantitative approach. Corea N; Corvaro M; Kluxen FM; Grivel A; Morgan N; Wiemann C; Basketter D Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Jun; 141():105408. PubMed ID: 37207870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Application of in vitro skin penetration measurements to confirm and refine the quantitative skin sensitization risk assessment of methylisothiazolinone. Rothe H; Ryan CA; Page L; Vinall J; Goebel C; Scheffler H; Toner F; Roper C; Kern PS Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 91():197-207. PubMed ID: 29080845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A review of critical factors in the conduct and interpretation of the human repeat insult patch test. McNamee PM; Api AM; Basketter DA; Frank Gerberick G; Gilpin DA; Hall BM; Jowsey I; Robinson MK Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Oct; 52(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 18639964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. In vitro and in vivo testing techniques for allergic contact dermatitis. Gerberick GF; Sikorski EE Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Jun; 9(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 9601899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience. Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Skin sensitization potency of isoeugenol and its dimers evaluated by a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay and guinea pig maximization test. Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Suzuki K; Yamazaki S J Appl Toxicol; 2008 May; 28(4):530-4. PubMed ID: 17929237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment. Basketter D; Darlenski R; Fluhr JW Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2008; 21(4):191-202. PubMed ID: 18509253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Updating the skin sensitization in vitro data assessment paradigm in 2009--a chemistry and QSAR perspective. Roberts DW; Patlewicz GY J Appl Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 30(3):286-8; discussion 289. PubMed ID: 20131408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Final amended report on the safety assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products. Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 4():1-82. PubMed ID: 19101832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Guinea pig sensitization assays: an experimental comparison of three methods. Modjtahedi BS; Fortenbach CR; Marsano JG; Gandhi AM; Staab R; Maibach HI Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 30(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 21265706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Final report of the safety assessment of Alcohol Denat., including SD Alcohol 3-A, SD Alcohol 30, SD Alcohol 39, SD Alcohol 39-B, SD Alcohol 39-C, SD Alcohol 40, SD Alcohol 40-B, and SD Alcohol 40-C, and the denaturants, Quassin, Brucine Sulfate/Brucine, and Denatonium Benzoate. Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 1():1-43. PubMed ID: 18569160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Quantitative risk assessment for skin sensitization: Success or failure? Kimber I; Gerberick GF; Basketter DA Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 83():104-108. PubMed ID: 27871868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Assessment of the skin sensitising potency of the lower alkyl methacrylate esters. Kimber I; Pemberton MA Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Oct; 70(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 24956587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Interactions of contact allergens with dendritic cells: opportunities and challenges for the development of novel approaches to hazard assessment. Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Gildea LA; Hulette BC; Betts CJ; Cumberbatch M; Dearman RJ; Kimber I Toxicol Sci; 2005 Nov; 88(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16014741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The local lymph node assay and potential application to the identification of drug allergens. Kimber I Toxicology; 2001 Feb; 158(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 11164993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A skin sensitization safety assessment of a new bleach activator technology in detergent applications. Roggeband R; Helmlinger G; Smith I; Wilhelm KP; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Apr; 46(4):211-9. PubMed ID: 12081699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Assessing the dermal safety of products intended for genital mucosal exposure. Farage MA; Scheffler H Curr Probl Dermatol; 2011; 40():116-124. PubMed ID: 21325846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A tiered asthma hazard characterization and exposure assessment approach for evaluation of consumer product ingredients. Maier A; Vincent MJ; Parker A; Gadagbui BK; Jayjock M Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Dec; 73(3):903-13. PubMed ID: 26416168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Skin Sensitization Induction Potential From Daily Exposure to Fragrances in Personal Care Products. Drechsel DA; Towle KM; Fung ES; Novick RM; Paustenbach DJ; Monnot AD Dermatitis; 2018; 29(6):324-331. PubMed ID: 30422886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. An alternative strategy to the use of guinea pigs for the identification of skin sensitization hazard. Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Chamberlain M; Barratt MD Food Chem Toxicol; 1995 Dec; 33(12):1051-6. PubMed ID: 8847001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]