These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10908931)
1. Torsional rigidity of scoliosis constructs. Wood KB; Wentorf FA; Ogilvie JW; Kim KT Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Aug; 25(15):1893-8. PubMed ID: 10908931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation using Luque-Galveston and Colorado II sacropelvic fixation: advantage of using locked proximal fixation. Early S; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(12):1396-401. PubMed ID: 15959368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation device for the thoracic spine. Hongo M; Ilharreborde B; Gay RE; Zhao C; Zhao KD; Berglund LJ; Zobitz M; An KN Eur Spine J; 2009 Aug; 18(8):1213-9. PubMed ID: 19404687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis: a biomechanical analysis. Sun E; Alkalay R; Vader D; Snyder BD J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19494747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-segment pedicle instrumentation. Biomechanical analysis of supplemental hook fixation. Chiba M; McLain RF; Yerby SA; Moseley TA; Smith TS; Benson DR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Feb; 21(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 8742203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of different anchors (foundations) for the pediatric dual growing rod technique. Mahar AT; Bagheri R; Oka R; Kostial P; Akbarnia BA Spine J; 2008; 8(6):933-9. PubMed ID: 18082463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation. Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lumbar pedicle screws versus hooks. Results in double major curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Barr SJ; Schuette AM; Emans JB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jun; 22(12):1369-79. PubMed ID: 9201841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pedicle screw motion in the osteoporotic spine after augmentation with laminar hooks, sublaminar wires, or calcium phosphate cement: a comparative analysis. Tan JS; Kwon BK; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG; Oxland TR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1723-30. PubMed ID: 15303014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical analysis of derotation of the thoracic spine using pedicle screws. Cheng I; Hay D; Iezza A; Lindsey D; Lenke LG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):1039-43. PubMed ID: 20393385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Segmental pedicle screw fixation or cross-links in multilevel lumbar constructs. a biomechanical analysis. Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Mohr RA; Nguyen BK Spine J; 2001; 1(5):373-9. PubMed ID: 14588318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical stability of transverse connectors in the setting of a thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Paik H; Cardoso MJ; Bernstock JD; Dmitriev AE Spine J; 2015 Jul; 15(7):1629-35. PubMed ID: 25771755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws. Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of translaminar facet joint fixation. A comparative study of poly-L-lactide pins, screws, and pedicle fixation. Deguchi M; Cheng BC; Sato K; Matsuyama Y; Zdeblick TA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(12):1307-12; discussion 1313. PubMed ID: 9654619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in curves more than 90 degrees. Kuklo TR; Lenke LG; O'Brien MF; Lehman RA; Polly DW; Schroeder TM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 15644761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical assessment of conventional unit rod fixation versus a unit rod pedicle screw construct: a human cadaver study. Erickson MA; Oliver T; Baldini T; Bach J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jun; 29(12):1314-9. PubMed ID: 15187631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees: is anterior release necessary? Luhmann SJ; Lenke LG; Kim YJ; Bridwell KH; Schootman M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Sep; 30(18):2061-7. PubMed ID: 16166896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of vertebral rotation corrected by different techniques and anchors in surgical treatment of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Fu G; Kawakami N; Goto M; Tsuji T; Ohara T; Imagama S J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):182-9. PubMed ID: 19412020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws. Dobbs MB; Lenke LG; Kim YJ; Kamath G; Peelle MW; Bridwell KH Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(20):2400-4. PubMed ID: 16985472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative intermediate and long-term results of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Wu X; Yang S; Xu W; Yang C; Ye S; Liu X; Li J; Wang J J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Oct; 23(7):467-73. PubMed ID: 20087225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]