102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10909104)
1. Developments in census taking in the last 25 years.
Dale A
Popul Trends; 2000; (100):40-6. PubMed ID: 10909104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. No vote--no census: an account of some of the events of 1910-1911.
White I
Popul Trends; 2010; (142):30-48. PubMed ID: 21187852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Population estimates; backseries methodology for 1992-2000.
Littlefield M; Fulton R
Popul Trends; 2005; (122):18-26. PubMed ID: 16411621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ONS Longitudinal Study--a prestigious past and a bright future.
Goldring S; Newman J
Popul Trends; 2010; (139):4-10. PubMed ID: 20379275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Opportunities for new research using the post-2001 ONS Longitudinal Study.
Blackwell L; Akinwale B; Antonatos A; Haskey J
Popul Trends; 2005; (121):8-16. PubMed ID: 16250299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The case for samples of anonymized records from the 1991 census.
Marsh C; Skinner C; Arber S; Penhale B; Openshaw S; Hobcraft J; Lievesley D; Walford N
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc; 1991; 154(2):305-40. PubMed ID: 12159132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An analysis of patient register data in the Longitudinal Study - what does it tell us about the quality of the data?
Smallwood S; Lynch K
Popul Trends; 2010; (141):148-66. PubMed ID: 20927034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The long shadow of childhood: associations between parental social class and own social class, educational attainment and timing of first birth; results from the ONS Longitudinal Study.
Buxton J; Clarke L; Grundy E; Marshall CE
Popul Trends; 2005; (121):17-26. PubMed ID: 16250300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sam Greenhouse's years at the Census Bureau and the UNRRA.
Keller J; Clark CZ
Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(21):3277-9. PubMed ID: 14566910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Census Coverage Survey--the key element of a one number census.
Pereira R
Popul Trends; 2002; (108):16-31. PubMed ID: 12138612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The sample of anonymised records.
Marsh C
ESRC Data Arch Bull; 1991; (48):3-9. PubMed ID: 12284768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 2011 census coverage assessment and adjustment strategy.
Abbott O
Popul Trends; 2007; (127):7-14. PubMed ID: 17508652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The 2011 Census taking shape: methodological and technological developments.
White I
Popul Trends; 2009; (136):64-72. PubMed ID: 19606600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Planning the 2001 census: only four years to go.
Jones GC
Popul Trends; 1997; (88):31-5. PubMed ID: 9296838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computerising the 1861 census abstracts and vital registration statistics.
Gatley DA
Local Popul Stud; 1997; (58):37-47. PubMed ID: 11619259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. OPCS and the 1981 census.
Boxer SC
Stat News Pol; 1980; (50):50.5-50.11. PubMed ID: 12222181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 2011 census taking shape: the selection of topics and questions.
White I; McLaren E
Popul Trends; 2009; (135):8-19. PubMed ID: 19391439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fifty years of United Kingdom national population projections: how accurate have they been?
Shaw C
Popul Trends; 2007; (128):8-23. PubMed ID: 17691537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Research implications of improvements in access to the ONS Longitudinal Study.
Rosato M; Harding S; McVey E; Brown J
Popul Trends; 1998; (91):35-42. PubMed ID: 9575541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethnicity and health: a comparison between the responses to the question on ethnicity in the 1991 census and health service records.
Jones CE
Local Popul Stud; 2007; (78):17-27. PubMed ID: 17645132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
