These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10909237)

  • 1. Novel popout is an attention-based phenomenon: an ERP analysis.
    Strayer DL; Johnston WA
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):459-70. PubMed ID: 10909237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ERP topography and human perceptual learning in the peripheral visual field.
    Shoji H; Skrandies W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 16356572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel popout and familiar popout in a brightness discrimination task.
    Diliberto KA; Altarriba J; Neill WT
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1494-500. PubMed ID: 11143459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking.
    Drew T; McCollough AW; Horowitz TS; Vogel EK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 19293115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Control networks and hemispheric asymmetries in parietal cortex during attentional orienting in different spatial reference frames.
    Wilson KD; Woldorff MG; Mangun GR
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):668-83. PubMed ID: 15808968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection.
    Anllo-Vento L; Hillyard SA
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Feb; 58(2):191-206. PubMed ID: 8838164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal variability of the N2pc during efficient and inefficient visual search.
    Dowdall JR; Luczak A; Tata MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Aug; 50(10):2442-53. PubMed ID: 22743179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related brain potentials reflect semantic priming in an object decision task.
    Holcomb PJ; McPherson WB
    Brain Cogn; 1994 Mar; 24(2):259-76. PubMed ID: 8185897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expert image analysts show enhanced visual processing in change detection.
    Curran T; Gibson L; Horne JH; Young B; Bozell AP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 19293112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual Event-Related Potentials to Novel Objects Predict Rapid Word Learning Ability in 20-Month-Olds.
    Borgström K; Torkildsen JV; Lindgren M
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2016; 41(5-8):308-323. PubMed ID: 28059564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of visual attention in multiple object tracking: evidence from ERPs.
    Doran MM; Hoffman JE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 20802834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming.
    Henson RN; Rylands A; Ross E; Vuilleumeir P; Rugg MD
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1674-89. PubMed ID: 15050590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit learning modulates selective attention at sensory levels of perceptual processing.
    Couperus JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 19304623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computational mechanisms of object constancy for visual recognition revealed by event-related potentials.
    Leek EC; Atherton CJ; Thierry G
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 17267003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Object recognition learning differentiates the representations of objects at the ERP component N1.
    Wang G; Suemitsu K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):372-80. PubMed ID: 17141565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Target discrimination delays attentional benefit for grouped contexts: An ERP study.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 1629():196-209. PubMed ID: 26477296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Object onset and parvocellular guidance of attentional allocation.
    Cole GG; Kentridge RW; Heywood CA
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 15828973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The categorization of natural scenes: brain attention networks revealed by dense sensor ERPs.
    Codispoti M; Ferrari V; Junghöfer M; Schupp HT
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):583-91. PubMed ID: 16750397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An unbinding problem? The disintegration of visible, previously attended objects does not attract attention.
    Wolfe JM; Oliva A; Butcher SJ; Arsenio HC
    J Vis; 2002; 2(3):256-71. PubMed ID: 12678587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-frequency analysis of target detection reveals an early interface between bottom-up and top-down processes in the gamma-band.
    Busch NA; Schadow J; Fründ I; Herrmann CS
    Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(4):1106-16. PubMed ID: 16246588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.