These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10909240)

  • 1. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.
    Gibson BS; Amelio J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 10909240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis.
    Yeh SL; Liao HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 18614130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?
    Remington RW; Folk CL; McLean JP
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 11281104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings.
    Schreij D; Owens C; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 18372744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhibition of return for the length of a line?
    Francis L; Milliken B
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1208-21. PubMed ID: 14710956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton.
    Burnham BR; Neely JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 18665729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
    Anderson BA; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Capturing attention is not that simple: different mechanisms for stimulus-driven and contingent capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1703-14. PubMed ID: 24037596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the uniqueness of attentional capture by uninformative gaze cues: facilitation interacts with the Simon effect and is rarely followed by IOR.
    McKee D; Christie J; Klein R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 18266505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings?
    Folk CL; Anderson BA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Jun; 17(3):421-6. PubMed ID: 20551369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.
    Folk CL; Remington RW; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 1431742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.
    Folk CL; Remington RW; Wright JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):317-29. PubMed ID: 8189195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.
    Pratt J; Hirshhorn M
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 14634813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of relational information in contingent capture.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1460-76. PubMed ID: 20919781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining whether attentional control settings are inclusive or exclusive.
    Pratt J; McAuliffe J
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Nov; 64(8):1361-70. PubMed ID: 12519032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the generality of the displaywide contingent orienting hypothesis: can a visual onset capture attention without top-down control settings for displaywide onset?
    Yeh SL; Liao HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 20638648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orienting in space and time: joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.
    Milliken B; Lupiáñez J; Roberts M; Stevanovski B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):877-83. PubMed ID: 15000534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
    Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.