These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10909240)
21. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds. Mounts JR Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1485-93. PubMed ID: 11143458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences. Joseph JS; Optican LM Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jul; 58(5):651-65. PubMed ID: 8710445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets. Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention. Folk CL; Remington RW; Wu SC Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The time course of intended and unintended allocation of attention. Horstmann G Psychol Res; 2006 Jan; 70(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 15340848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition. Pratt J; Hillis J; Gold JM Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):489-95. PubMed ID: 11700899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: testing a two-process model. Anderson BA; Folk CL Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):342-52. PubMed ID: 20139450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. On the costs and benefits of repeating a nonspatial feature in an exogenous spatial cuing paradigm. Klein RM; Wang Y; Dukewich KR; He S; Hu K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2293-304. PubMed ID: 26153659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Orienting of attention without awareness is affected by measurement-induced attentional control settings. Ivanoff J; Klein RM J Vis; 2003; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 12678623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue. Henderson JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 1826325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition. Visser TA; Barnes D Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 19304628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. Ansorge U; Heumann M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):937-48. PubMed ID: 14585015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture. Liao HI; Yeh SL Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 21645875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. On the spatial metric of short-SOA costs of exogenous cuing. Chen P; Moore C; Mordkoff JT Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 18510134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]