These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10909241)

  • 21. Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision.
    Nothdurft HC
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Oct; 52(4):355-75. PubMed ID: 1437470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual search asymmetry: the influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features.
    Shen J; Reingold EM
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):464-75. PubMed ID: 11414134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search.
    Kunar MA; Flusberg S; Wolfe JM
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):314-28. PubMed ID: 18372752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Focal visual attention and pattern discrimination.
    Saarinen J
    Perception; 1993; 22(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 8414877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces.
    Lavie N; Ro T; Russell C
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12930485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual search for positional relationships between pattern elements.
    Saarinen J
    Scand J Psychol; 1996 Sep; 37(3):294-301. PubMed ID: 8857001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors: the role of load.
    Forster S; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 18377168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recognizing faces defined by texture gradients.
    Liu CH; Collin CA; Farivar R; Chaudhuri A
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jan; 67(1):158-67. PubMed ID: 15912879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pigeon perception and discrimination of rapidly changing texture stimuli.
    Cook RG; Cavoto BR; Katz JS; Cavoto KK
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1997 Oct; 23(4):390-400. PubMed ID: 9335133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Texture discrimination and visual search: development, learning and plasticity].
    Sireteanu R; Rettenbach R
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996 Jan; 208(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 8839338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The late onset of visual texture segmentation in kittens.
    Wilkinson F; Crotogino J
    Behav Brain Res; 1995 Jun; 68(2):201-17. PubMed ID: 7654306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets: no special role for onsets.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jul; 57(5):583-97. PubMed ID: 7644319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. What you see is what you get: functional equivalence of a perceptually filled-in surface and a physically presented stimulus.
    Lleras A; Moore CM
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Oct; 17(10):876-81. PubMed ID: 17100788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intra- and cross-dimensional visual search for single-feature targets.
    Cohen A; Magen H
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):291-307. PubMed ID: 10089762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When figure-ground segmentation modulates brightness: the case of phantom illumination.
    Zavagno D; Daneyko O
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):166-74. PubMed ID: 18635151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Closure of salient regions determines search for a collinear target configuration.
    Conci M; Müller HJ; Elliott MA
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jan; 69(1):32-47. PubMed ID: 17515214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.
    Bravo MJ; Nakayama K
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):465-72. PubMed ID: 1594436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping.
    Rensink RA; Enns JT
    Psychol Rev; 1995 Jan; 102(1):101-30. PubMed ID: 7878160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: visual search.
    Geisler WS; Chou KL
    Psychol Rev; 1995 Apr; 102(2):356-78. PubMed ID: 7740093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional capture with various distractor and target types.
    Chastain G; Cheal M
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):979-90. PubMed ID: 11578059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.