These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10909251)

  • 1. Method of stimulation, mouth movements, concentration, and viscosity: effects on the degree of taste adaptation.
    Theunissen MJ; Kroeze JH; Schifferstein HN
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):607-14. PubMed ID: 10909251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sweetness does not habituate during a sip-and-spit experiment.
    Schifferstein HN; Frijters JE
    Physiol Behav; 1992 Feb; 51(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 1557443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mouth movements diminish taste adaptation, but rate of mouth movement does not affect adaptation.
    Theunissen MJ; Kroeze JH
    Chem Senses; 1996 Oct; 21(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 8902283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of pulsation rate and viscosity on pulsation-induced taste enhancement: new insights into texture-taste interactions.
    Burseg KM; Camacho S; Bult JH
    J Agric Food Chem; 2011 May; 59(10):5548-53. PubMed ID: 21510707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Taste adaptation during the eating of sweetened yogurt.
    Theunissen MJ; Polet IA; Kroeze JH; Schifferstein HN
    Appetite; 2000 Feb; 34(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 10744888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paradoxical adaptation to taste mixtures.
    Lawless H
    Physiol Behav; 1982 Jul; 29(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 7122722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Central processes in gustatory adaptation.
    Bujas Z; Ajduković D; Szabo S; Mayer D; Vodanović M
    Physiol Behav; 1995 May; 57(5):875-80. PubMed ID: 7610138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determinants of cumulative successive contrast in saltiness intensity judgments.
    Schifferstein HN; Oudejans IM
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jul; 58(5):713-24. PubMed ID: 8710450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the intensity of NaCl solutions on adaptation degree and recovery time course.
    Szabo S; Bujas Z; Ajduković D; Mayer D; Vodanović M
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 9055614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analysis of the role of stimulus removal in taste adaptation by means of simulated drinking.
    Halpern BP; Kelling ST; Meiselman HL
    Physiol Behav; 1986; 36(5):925-8. PubMed ID: 3714870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The generalizability of capsaicin sensitization and desensitization.
    Prescott J
    Physiol Behav; 1999 Jul; 66(5):741-9. PubMed ID: 10405101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Psychophysics of sweet taste. II. Statistical theory of the stimulus-response behavior of sweet taste receptors].
    Hoppe K
    Nahrung; 1981; 25(2):151-65. PubMed ID: 7242654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temperature Affects Human Sweet Taste via At Least Two Mechanisms.
    Green BG; Nachtigal D
    Chem Senses; 2015 Jul; 40(6):391-9. PubMed ID: 25963040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sip and spit or sip and swallow: Choice of method differentially alters taste intensity estimates across stimuli.
    Running CA; Hayes JE
    Physiol Behav; 2017 Nov; 181():95-99. PubMed ID: 28912088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaction between stimuli with different taste qualities evaluated by reaction time.
    Bujas Z; Szabo S; Ajduković D; Mayer D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):1120-6. PubMed ID: 1837301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Autonomic nervous system responses to sweet taste: evidence for habituation rather than pleasure.
    Leterme A; Brun L; Dittmar A; Robin O
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Mar; 93(4-5):994-9. PubMed ID: 18262575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of intra-oral manipulation in the perception of sensory attributes.
    de Wijk RA; Engelen L; Prinz JF
    Appetite; 2003 Feb; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 12631499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sweet taste enhancement through pulsatile stimulation depends on pulsation period not on conscious pulse perception.
    Burseg KM; Brattinga C; de Kok PM; Bult JH
    Physiol Behav; 2010 Jun; 100(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 20307558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Gustometry usefulness for the evaluation of taste sense efficiency. Part I. The range of taste substances concentrations and the result of gustometry examination].
    Klimacka-Nawrot E; Suchecka W; Błońska-Fajfrowska B
    Wiad Lek; 2007; 60(9-10):409-14. PubMed ID: 18350712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnitude estimation of adaptation to salt using a flow chamber for stimulus delivery.
    Bujas Z; Szabo S; Ajduković D; Mayer D
    Physiol Behav; 1991 Apr; 49(4):735-7. PubMed ID: 1881977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.