These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10911710)

  • 1. Final comment. The articles by Gøtzsche and Olsen are not official Cochrane reviews and lack scientific merit.
    Dean PB
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Jun; 97(25):3106. PubMed ID: 10911710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer.
    Freedman DA; Petitti DB; Robins JM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 33(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 15075144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Swedish mammography screening trials. Check up on your sources.
    Dean PB
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Jun; 97(25):3105-6. PubMed ID: 10911709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Breast cancer screening by mammography: evaluation by Gotzsche and Olsen meta-analysis].
    Agence Nationale d'Accrédiation et d'Evaluation en Santé
    J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 12741380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The mammographic screening trials: commentary on the recent work by Olsen and Gøtzsche.
    Duffy SW; Tabár L; Smith RA
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2002; 52(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 11929006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The mammographic screening trials: commentary on the recent work by Olsen and Gøtzsche.
    Duffy S; Tabár L; Smith RA
    J Surg Oncol; 2002 Dec; 81(4):159-62; discussion 162-6. PubMed ID: 12451615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Misleading report concerning our work on mammographic screening].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jan; 99(1-2):75-6. PubMed ID: 11871179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The Lancet supports Danish researchers against the breast cancer group. Mammographic screening causes a conflict within Cochrane].
    Ohlin E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Nov; 163(48):6769. PubMed ID: 11768908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comment on the Elwood Paper.
    Kopans DB
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Mar; Doc No 42():[1687 words; 8 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8117361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [There is something wrong in the studies of mammography! No support for the conclusions on benefits of breast cancer screening].
    Olsen O; Gøtzsche PC
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Jan; 97(4):286-7. PubMed ID: 10684221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Good reasons for mammography screening. About misunderstood criticism of underlying investigations!].
    Garne JP; Hessov I
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Jul; 162(31):4165-7. PubMed ID: 10962925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response to Kopans.
    Elwood JM; Cox B; Richardson AK
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Mar; Doc No 43():[1183 words; 9 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related accuracy of screening mammography: how should it be measured?
    Feig SA
    Radiology; 2000 Mar; 214(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 10715022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rejoinder to Elwood's reply.
    Kopans DB
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Apr; Doc No 47():[1069 words; 5 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast screening in women aged 40-49 years: what next?
    Dickersin K
    Lancet; 1999 Jun; 353(9168):1896-7. PubMed ID: 10371561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.
    Ringash J;
    CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 11233866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should we recommend screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49?
    Esserman L; Kerlikowske K
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1996 Mar; 10(3):357-64; discussion: 370-6. PubMed ID: 8820449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The mammography screening controversy: who and what is heard in the press?
    Holmes-Rovner M; Charles S
    Patient Educ Couns; 2003 Sep; 51(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 12915283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of breast cancer screening by mammography in younger women.
    Elwood JM; Cox B; Richardson AK
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Feb; Doc No 32():[23,227 words; 195 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8305999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40-49 years. Current evidence from randomized controlled trials.
    Cox B
    Cancer; 1996 Aug; 78(3):572-3. PubMed ID: 8697411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.