231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10913986)
1. Transnasal gastroscopy.
Christensen M; Achiam M; Trap R; Støckel M; Rosenberg J; Schulze S
Dan Med Bull; 2000 Jun; 47(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 10913986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Transnasal gastroscopy].
Christensen M; Achiam M; Trap R; Støckel M; Rosenberg J; Schulze S
Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Jun; 162(24):3464-7. PubMed ID: 10918831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transnasal gastroscopy compared to conventional gastroscopy: a randomized study of feasibility, safety, and tolerance.
Campo R; Montserrat A; Brullet E
Endoscopy; 1998 Jun; 30(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 9693891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility and tolerance of 2-way and 4-way angulation videoscopes for unsedated patients undergoing transnasal EGD in GI cancer screening.
Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 18279865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis].
Krakamp B; Parusel M; Saers T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jan; 129(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 14724781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patients' perception of transnasal gastroscopy.
Luman W
Singapore Med J; 2008 Apr; 49(4):339-41. PubMed ID: 18418528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.
Thota PN; Zuccaro G; Vargo JJ; Conwell DL; Dumot JA; Xu M
Endoscopy; 2005 Jun; 37(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15933930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early experience with unsedated ultrathin 4.9 mm transnasal gastroscopy: a pilot study.
Cheung J; Bailey R; Veldhuyzen van Zanten S; McLean R; Fedorak RN; Morse J; Millan M; Guzowski T; Goodman KJ;
Can J Gastroenterol; 2008 Nov; 22(11):917-22. PubMed ID: 19018337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective controlled trial of an ultrathin versus a conventional endoscope in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Mulcahy HE; Riches A; Kiely M; Farthing MJ; Fairclough PD
Endoscopy; 2001 Apr; 33(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 11315891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Less tachycardia during transnasal versus conventional gastroscopy.
Neuenschwander AU; Christensen M; Schulze S; Rosenberg J; Schulze S; Trap R
Dan Med J; 2012 Jun; 59(6):A4432. PubMed ID: 22677235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Sumida Y; Yamamoto H; Nakamura K; Nawata H
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 22(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 17376037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the cardiovascular impacts of transnasal versus transoral gastroscopy in the aged patients with or without hypertension.
Gu Q; Wu C; Gu L; Yu C; Fang Y; Cai S; Youming L
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(94-95):1562-5. PubMed ID: 19950831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unsedated transnasal percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in selected patients.
Vitale MA; Villotti G; D'Alba L; De Cesare MA; Frontespezi S; Iacopini G
Endoscopy; 2005 Jan; 37(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 15657858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blinded nonrandomized comparative study of gastric examination with a magnetically guided capsule endoscope and standard videoendoscope.
Rey JF; Ogata H; Hosoe N; Ohtsuka K; Ogata N; Ikeda K; Aihara H; Pangtay I; Hibi T; Kudo SE; Tajiri H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Feb; 75(2):373-81. PubMed ID: 22154417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unsedated transnasal versus transoral sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a one-series prospective study on safety and patient acceptability.
Stroppa I; Grasso E; Paoluzi OA; Razzini C; Tosti C; Andrei F; Biancone L; Palmieri G; Romeo F; Pallone F
Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Sep; 40(9):767-75. PubMed ID: 18424197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective clinical trial of magnetic-anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for large early gastric cancer (with videos).
Gotoda T; Oda I; Tamakawa K; Ueda H; Kobayashi T; Kakizoe T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jan; 69(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18599053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective evaluation of a new ultrathin one-plane bending videoendoscope for transnasal EGD: a comparative study on performance and tolerance.
Dumortier J; Josso C; Roman S; Fumex F; Lepilliez V; Prost B; Lot M; Guillaud O; Petit-Laurent F; Lapalus MG; Ponchon T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jul; 66(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 17591468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
