BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10914083)

  • 1. Is there a learning curve in diagnosing urolithiasis with noncontrast helical computed tomography?
    Rosser CJ; Zagoria R; Dixon R; Scurry WC; Bare RL; McCullough DL; Assimos DG
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2000 Jun; 51(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 10914083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can noncontrast helical computed tomography replace intravenous urography for evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic?
    Chen MY; Zagoria RJ
    J Emerg Med; 1999; 17(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 10195491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Renal colic: a prospective evaluation of non-enhanced spiral CT versus intravenous pyelography.
    Mendelson RM; Arnold-Reed DE; Kuan M; Wedderburn AW; Anderson JE; Sweetman G; Bulsara MK; Mander J
    Australas Radiol; 2003 Mar; 47(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 12581050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-Dose Unenhanced Computed Tomography with Iterative Reconstruction for Diagnosis of Ureter Stones.
    Chi BH; Chang IH; Lee DH; Park SB; Kim KD; Moon YT; Hur T
    Yonsei Med J; 2018 May; 59(3):389-396. PubMed ID: 29611401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent.
    Liu W; Esler SJ; Kenny BJ; Goh RH; Rainbow AJ; Stevenson GW
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 10751467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial.
    Pfister SA; Deckart A; Laschke S; Dellas S; Otto U; Buitrago C; Roth J; Wiesner W; Bongartz G; Gasser TC
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Nov; 13(11):2513-20. PubMed ID: 12898174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of ureteral calculi in emergency departments.
    Elton TJ; Roth CS; Berquist TH; Silverstein MD
    J Gen Intern Med; 1993 Feb; 8(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 8441076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Imaging studies of excretory urography and computed tomography scan for patients suffering from renal colic].
    Shimizu H; Hariu K; Tohyama Y; Kamiyama Y; Iiyama T; Tomomasa H; Yazaki T; Umeda T
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1998 Feb; 44(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 9546123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized prospective comparison of non-contrast enhanced helical computed tomography and intravenous urography in the diagnosis of acute ureteric colic.
    Homer JA; Davies-Payne DL; Peddinti BS
    Australas Radiol; 2001 Aug; 45(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 11531750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of selective use of intravenous pyelography in patients presenting to the emergency department with ureteral colic.
    Tasso SR; Shields CP; Rosenberg CR; Sixsmith DM; Pang DS
    Acad Emerg Med; 1997 Aug; 4(8):780-4. PubMed ID: 9262695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evaluation of suspected renal colic: ultrasound scan versus excretory urography.
    Sinclair D; Wilson S; Toi A; Greenspan L
    Ann Emerg Med; 1989 May; 18(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 2655508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intravenous urography in the emergency department: when do we need it?
    Richards JR; Christman CA
    Eur J Emerg Med; 1999 Jun; 6(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10461557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in the use of unenhanced helical CT for acute urinary colic.
    Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Saunders HS; Dyer RB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1447-50. PubMed ID: 10584780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How accurate are emergency clinicians at interpreting noncontrast computed tomography for suspected renal colic?
    Holdgate A; Chan T
    Acad Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 10(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 12670843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic.
    Tack D; Sourtzis S; Delpierre I; de Maertelaer V; Gevenois PA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Feb; 180(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 12540420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [First experiences in non-enhanced spiral computed tomography for diagnosis of acute flank pain].
    Tzivian A; Sherman I; Yacobi Y; Elias S; Sidi A; Asherov J
    Harefuah; 2000 Jul; 139(1-2):22-4, 79. PubMed ID: 10979447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT.
    Sommer FG; Jeffrey RB; Rubin GD; Napel S; Rimmer SA; Benford J; Harter PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):509-13. PubMed ID: 7645461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain.
    Niall O; Russell J; MacGregor R; Duncan H; Mullins J
    J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):534-7. PubMed ID: 9915442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unenhanced spiral CT in acute ureteral colic: a replacement for excretory urography?
    Ryu JA; Kim B; Jeon YH; Lee J; Lee JW; Jeon SS; Park KH
    Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 11752964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: incidence of associated urinary tract findings.
    Katz DS; Lane MJ; Sommer FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1319-22. PubMed ID: 8633440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.