267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10914628)
1. Analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracing by physician and computer.
Bracero LA; Roshanfekr D; Byrne DW
J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 10914628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period.
Gonçalves H; Bernardes J; Rocha AP; Ayres-de-Campos D
Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):585-91. PubMed ID: 17261357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making.
Ross MG; Devoe LD; Rosen KG
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Mar; 15(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 15280144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of fetal heart rate baseline estimation by SisPorto 2.01 and a consensus of clinicians.
Ayres-de-Campos D; Bernardes J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 15541853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome.
Figueras F; Albela S; Bonino S; Palacio M; Barrau E; Hernandez S; Casellas C; Coll O; Cararach V
J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 15914348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal heart rate baselines in twins. Interobserver agreement in antepartum estimation.
Bernardes J; Costa-Pereira A; Calejo L; Ayres-de-Campos D; PatrÃcio B; Pereira-Leite L
J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 10710739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
Devane D; Lalor J
J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of neonatal state by computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings: the antepartum arm of the SisPorto multicentre validation study.
Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jan; 118(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 15596273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Pre-partum cardiotocography: comparison between the traditional and the computed systems].
Soncini E; Grignaffini A; Vadora E
Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 2000; 71 Suppl 1():337-43. PubMed ID: 11424766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of vibroacoustic stimulation on fetal heart rate parameters utilizing computer analysis.
Barton JR; Hiett AK
Am J Perinatol; 1997 Apr; 14(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 9259933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the effects of meperidine and nalbuphine on intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings.
Giannina G; Guzman ER; Lai YL; Lake MF; Cernadas M; Vintzileos AM
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Sep; 86(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 7651658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A new approach to quantitative electronic foetal heart-rate analysis].
Roemer VM; Walden R
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2010 Jan; 214(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 20155661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An algorithm for the recovery of fetal heart rate series from CTG data.
Cesarelli M; Romano M; Bifulco P; Fedele F; Bracale M
Comput Biol Med; 2007 May; 37(5):663-9. PubMed ID: 16893537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate changes after antepartum external cephalic version.
Weiner Z; Farmakides G; Hsieh H; Maulik D
J Reprod Med; 1996 Sep; 41(9):680-4. PubMed ID: 8887194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The computerized fetal heart rate analysis in post-term pregnancy identifies patients at risk for fetal distress in labour.
Valensise H; Facchinetti F; Vasapollo B; Giannini F; Monte ID; Arduini D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Apr; 125(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 16459010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System.
Blackwell SC; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Gyamfi Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 205(4):378.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21864826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor.
Salamalekis E; Hintipas E; Salloum I; Vasios G; Loghis C; Vitoratos N; Chrelias Ch; Creatsas G
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16690510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antepartum cardiotocography: a study of fetal reactivity in frequency domain.
Romano M; Bracale M; Cesarelli M; Campanile M; Bifulco P; De Falco M; Sansone M; Di Lieto A
Comput Biol Med; 2006 Jun; 36(6):619-33. PubMed ID: 16005863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
