1229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10914803)
21. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
Wang HL; Bunyaratavej P; Labadie M; Shyr Y; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix allograft in the treatment of multiple marginal gingival recession defects.
Thombre V; Koudale SB; Bhongade ML
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):e88-94. PubMed ID: 23593633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-term outcome following treatment of multiple Miller class I and II recession defects in esthetic areas of the mouth.
Zucchelli G; De Sanctis M
J Periodontol; 2005 Dec; 76(12):2286-92. PubMed ID: 16332241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane.
Müller HP; Stahl M; Eger T
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Apr; 21(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 11829391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Coronally advanced flap: the post-surgical position of the gingival margin is an important factor for achieving complete root coverage.
Pini Prato GP; Baldi C; Nieri M; Franseschi D; Cortellini P; Clauser C; Rotundo R; Muzzi L
J Periodontol; 2005 May; 76(5):713-22. PubMed ID: 15898931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions.
Cordioli G; Mortarino C; Chierico A; Grusovin MG; Majzoub Z
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1470-6. PubMed ID: 11759857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Root coverage using the coronally positioned flap with or without a subepithelial connective tissue graft.
da Silva RC; Joly JC; de Lima AF; Tatakis DN
J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 15088880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Treatment of root surface: root planning versus polishing.
Pini-Prato G; Baldi C; Pagliaro U; Nieri M; Saletta D; Rotundo R; Cortellini P
J Periodontol; 1999 Sep; 70(9):1064-76. PubMed ID: 10505810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Cardaropoli D; Tamagnone L; Roffredo A; Gaveglio L
J Periodontol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 21721988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cervical restoration and the amount of soft tissue coverage achieved by coronally advanced flap: a 2-year follow-up randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Santamaria MP; da Silva Feitosa D; Nociti FH; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 May; 36(5):434-41. PubMed ID: 19419445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative study of two root coverage procedures: a 24-month follow-up multicenter study.
Moses O; Artzi Z; Sculean A; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Romanos GE; Nemcovsky CE
J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16460244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Treatment of Miller Class I and II localized recession defects using laterally positioned flaps: a 24-month study.
Chambrone LA; Chambrone L
Am J Dent; 2009 Dec; 22(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 20178209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Treatment outcomes of ligature-induced recession in the dog model using guided tissue regeneration or coronally positioned flap procedures.
Papageorgiou A; Vouros I; Konstantinidis A
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 11(2):177-87. PubMed ID: 19431957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal gingival recession.
Pini Prato G; Tinti C; Vincenzi G; Magnani C; Cortellini P; Clauser C
J Periodontol; 1992 Nov; 63(11):919-28. PubMed ID: 1453307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Molina GO; Souza SL; Taba M; Grisi MF
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1477-84. PubMed ID: 11759858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Significance of the epithelial collar on the subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Byun HY; Oh TJ; Abuhussein HM; Yamashita J; Soehren SE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2009 Jun; 80(6):924-32. PubMed ID: 19485822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A preliminary comparative study of the guided tissue regeneration and free gingival graft procedures for adjacent facial root coverage.
Ito K; Oshio K; Shiomi N; Murai S
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 11203942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft.
de Queiroz Côrtes A; Sallum AW; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Sep; 33(9):683-9. PubMed ID: 16856894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
