714 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10916211)
21. Comparison of ultrasound and X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements in a case control study of female rheumatoid arthritis patients and randomly selected subjects in the population.
Haugeberg G; Ørstavik RE; Uhlig T; Falch JA; Halse JI; Kvien TK
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jun; 14(4):312-9. PubMed ID: 12730749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(6):441-9. PubMed ID: 10663343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men.
Gonnelli S; Cepollaro C; Gennari L; Montagnani A; Caffarelli C; Merlotti D; Rossi S; Cadirni A; Nuti R
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Aug; 16(8):963-8. PubMed ID: 15599495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of broadband ultrasound attenuation to single X-ray absorptiometry measurements at the calcaneus in postmenopausal women.
Salamone LM; Krall EA; Harris S; Dawson-Hughes B
Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Feb; 54(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 8012876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The clinical value of calcaneus stiffness index calculated by quantitative ultrasound test in screening and diagnosis of osteoporosis].
Hu Y; Li Q; Lin H; Shi L; Ma H; Chen Y; Gao X
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 54(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 25877142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Which bone densitometry and which skeletal site are clinically useful for monitoring bone mass?
Ito M; Nishida A; Kono J; Kono M; Uetani M; Hayashi K
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Dec; 14(12):959-64. PubMed ID: 12955312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine in assessment and follow-up of skeletal status in patients after kidney transplantation.
Kovac D; Lindic J; Kandus A; Bren FA
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Apr; 14(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 12730786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Heel ultrasonography is not a good screening tool for bone loss after kidney and pancreas transplantation.
Mack-Shipman LR; O'Grady DM; Erickson JM; Walker CW; Moore TE; Burkman TW; Lane JT; Larsen JL
Clin Transplant; 2004 Oct; 18(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 15344969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of an imaging heel quantitative ultrasound device (DTU-one) with densitometric and ultrasonic measurements.
Diessel E; Fuerst T; Njeh CF; Hans D; Cheng S; Genant HK
Br J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 73(865):23-30. PubMed ID: 10721316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Normative calcaneal quantitative ultrasound data as an estimation of skeletal development in Swedish children and adolescents.
Alwis G; Rosengren B; Nilsson JA; Stenevi-Lundgren S; Sundberg M; Sernbo I; Karlsson MK
Calcif Tissue Int; 2010 Dec; 87(6):493-506. PubMed ID: 20960155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Calcaneal ultrasonometry: response to treatment in comparison with dual x-ray absorptiometry measurements of the lumbar spine and femur.
Rosenthall L; Caminis J; Tenehouse A
Calcif Tissue Int; 1999 Mar; 64(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10024375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound has a role in out ruling low bone mineral density in axial spondyloarthropathy.
Fitzgerald GE; Anachebe T; McCarroll KG; O'Shea F
Clin Rheumatol; 2020 Jun; 39(6):1971-1979. PubMed ID: 31953568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Phalangeal quantitative ultrasound technology and dual energy X-ray densitometry in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: influence of sex and menopausal status.
Camozzi V; Lumachi F; Mantero F; Piccolo M; Luisetto G
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jul; 14(7):602-8. PubMed ID: 12730752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mandibular bone mineral density measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: relationship to hip bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound at calcaneus and hand phalanges.
Pluskiewicz W; Tarnawska B; Drozdzowska B
Br J Radiol; 2000 Mar; 73(867):288-92. PubMed ID: 10817045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Age-related changes in Os calcis ultrasonic indices: a 2-year prospective study.
Schott AM; Hans D; Garnero P; Sornay-Rendu E; Delmas PD; Meunier PJ
Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 8695972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Changes in QUS and BMD measurements with antiresorptive therapy: a two-year longitudinal study.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman
Calcif Tissue Int; 2001 Sep; 69(3):138-46. PubMed ID: 11683528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differential effects of primary hyperparathyroidism on ultrasound properties of bone.
Ingle BM; Thomas WE; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Jul; 13(7):572-8. PubMed ID: 12111018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Panoramic-based mandibular indices in relation to mandibular bone mineral density and skeletal status assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound.
Drozdzowska B; Pluskiewicz W; Tarnawska B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 12424634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
