BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

640 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10917986)

  • 1. A comparative evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene, umbilical vein, and saphenous vein bypass grafts for femoral-popliteal above-knee revascularization: a prospective randomized Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study.
    Johnson WC; Lee KK
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Aug; 32(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 10917986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery.
    Ambler GK; Twine CP
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 2(2):CD001487. PubMed ID: 29429146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery.
    Mamode N; Scott RN
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD001487. PubMed ID: 10796649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of stretch and non-stretch polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) prosthetic grafts for femoro-popliteal bypass.
    Lu CH; Chang J; Lai ST; Shih CC
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2002 May; 65(5):200-4. PubMed ID: 12166763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of externally supported Dacron and polytetrafluoroethylene prosthetic bypasses for femorofemoral and axillofemoral arterial reconstructions. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #141.
    Johnson WC; Lee KK
    J Vasc Surg; 1999 Dec; 30(6):1077-83. PubMed ID: 10587392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective randomized study on bilateral above-knee femoropopliteal revascularization: Polytetrafluoroethylene graft versus reversed saphenous vein.
    Ballotta E; Renon L; Toffano M; Da Giau G
    J Vasc Surg; 2003 Nov; 38(5):1051-5. PubMed ID: 14603216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery.
    Twine CP; McLain AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 May; (5):CD001487. PubMed ID: 20464717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PTFE versus human umbilical vein in above knee femoro-popliteal bypass. Early results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Aalders GJ; van Vroonhoven TJ; Lobach HJ; Wijffels CC
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1988; 29(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 3283140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Femoropopliteal prosthetic bypass with glutaraldehyde stabilized human umbilical vein (HUV).
    Neufang A; Espinola-Klein C; Dorweiler B; Messow CM; Schmiedt W; Vahl CF
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 17600663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of conduits for leg revascularization.
    Weisel RD; Johnston KW; Baird RJ; Drezner AD; Oates TK; Lipton IH
    Surgery; 1981 Jan; 89(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 7466615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A meta-analysis to compare Dacron versus polytetrafluroethylene grafts for above-knee femoropopliteal artery bypass.
    Rychlik IJ; Davey P; Murphy J; O'Donnell ME
    J Vasc Surg; 2014 Aug; 60(2):506-15. PubMed ID: 24973288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The consequences of a failed femoropopliteal bypass grafting: comparison of saphenous vein and PTFE grafts.
    Jackson MR; Belott TP; Dickason T; Kaiser WJ; Modrall JG; Valentine RJ; Clagett GP
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):498-504; 504-5. PubMed ID: 10957656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome of the FUSION vascular graft for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass.
    Assadian A; Eckstein HH;
    J Vasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 61(3):713-9.e1. PubMed ID: 25498193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective randomized trial comparing vein with polytetrafluoroethylene in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting.
    Burger DH; Kappetein AP; Van Bockel JH; Breslau PJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Aug; 32(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 10917987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polytetrafluoroethylene versus human umbilical vein in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass: six-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Aalders GJ; van Vroonhoven TJ
    J Vasc Surg; 1992 Dec; 16(6):816-23; discussion 823-4. PubMed ID: 1460707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy between the FUSION BIOLINE heparin-coated vascular graft and the standard expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft for femoropopliteal bypass.
    Lumsden AB; Morrissey NJ;
    J Vasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 61(3):703-12.e1. PubMed ID: 25720929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term outcome of femoral above-knee popliteal artery bypass using autologous saphenous vein versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts.
    Sala F; Hassen-Khodja R; Lecis A; Bouillanne PJ; Declemy S; Batt M
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2003 Jul; 17(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 14670018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized trial comparing infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting with and without vein interposition cuff at the distal anastomosis. The Joint Vascular Research Group.
    Stonebridge PA; Prescott RJ; Ruckley CV
    J Vasc Surg; 1997 Oct; 26(4):543-50. PubMed ID: 9357453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized comparison of ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent graft vs prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.
    McQuade K; Gable D; Hohman S; Pearl G; Theune B
    J Vasc Surg; 2009 Jan; 49(1):109-15, 116.e1-9; discussion 116. PubMed ID: 19028055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions.
    Veith FJ; Gupta SK; Ascer E; White-Flores S; Samson RH; Scher LA; Towne JB; Bernhard VM; Bonier P; Flinn WR
    J Vasc Surg; 1986 Jan; 3(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 3510323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.