These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10918454)

  • 1. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
    Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of digital dental X-ray systems with self-developing film and manual processing for endodontic file length determination.
    Eikenberg S; Vandre R
    J Endod; 2000 Feb; 26(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 11194373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Brown WP; Lewis J; Benefiel M; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
    Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of several digital radiographic imaging systems for laboratory determination of endodontic file length.
    Oliveira ML; Ambrosano GM; Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F; Tosoni GM
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21276021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ex vivo comparison of radiographic and electronic root canal length measurements in primary molars.
    Topaloglu-Ak A; Aykut Yetkiner A; Güniz Baksi B; Eronat C
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Jun; 16(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 26147823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15070845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of endodontic file lengths: a density profile plot analysis.
    Piepenbring ME; Potter BJ; Weller RN; Loushine RJ
    J Endod; 2000 Oct; 26(10):615-8. PubMed ID: 11199805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic endodontic working length estimation: comparison of three digital image receptors.
    Athar A; Angelopoulos C; Katz JO; Williams KB; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):604-8. PubMed ID: 18718798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of digitally scanned radiographs with conventional film for the detection of small endodontic instruments.
    Fuge KN; Stuck AM; Love RM
    Int Endod J; 1998 Mar; 31(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 9868939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement algorithm accuracy of the RVG-PCi in vertical and diagonal assessments at various beam energies.
    Garlock JA; Scarfe WC; Kamer KR; Farman AG
    J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):646-50. PubMed ID: 9220748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gray scale inversion in digital image for measurement of tooth length.
    Oliveira ML; Vieira ML; Cruz AD; Bóscolo FN; DE Almeida SM
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):703-6. PubMed ID: 23338264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of combined digital imaging parameters on endodontic file measurements.
    de Oliveira ML; Pinto GC; Ambrosano GM; Tosoni GM
    J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1404-7. PubMed ID: 22980188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a digital measurement tool to estimate working length in endodontics.
    Lamus F; Katz JO; Glaros AG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2001 Feb; 2(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12167941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of the distance between the minor foramen and the anatomic apex by digital and conventional radiography.
    Melius B; Jiang J; Zhu Q
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11833685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation dose reduction during endodontic therapy: a new technique combining an apex locator (Root ZX) and a digital imaging system (RadioVisioGraphy).
    Saad AY; al-Nazhan S
    J Endod; 2000 Mar; 26(3):144-7. PubMed ID: 11199707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of high-resolution digital imaging technology for small diameter K-file length determination in endodontics.
    Vandenberghe B; Bud M; Sutanto A; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 19452176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of various digital processing algorithms on the measurement accuracy of endodontic file length.
    Kal BI; Baksi BG; Dündar N; Sen BH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 17234548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.