233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10918790)
21. NIH open-access plans draw fire from both sides.
Check E
Nature; 2005 Feb; 433(7026):561. PubMed ID: 15703710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. PubMed Central and the new publishing landscape: shifts and tradeoffs.
Caelleigh AS
Acad Med; 2000 Jan; 75(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 10667868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [PubMed Central: a metamorphosis of print-on-paper publishing?].
Lacour JP
Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2000 Jan; 127(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 10717555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Online archive must serve authors as well as publishers.
Harnad S
Nature; 1999 Sep; 401(6752):423. PubMed ID: 10519533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. PLoS stays afloat with bulk publishing.
Butler D
Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7200):11. PubMed ID: 18596768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving.
Mower A; Youngkin ME
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18347463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. "E-biomed" and clinical research.
Ammann AJ
N Engl J Med; 1999 Sep; 341(14):1080; author reply 1081. PubMed ID: 10507924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Online research archive will be free to all.
Cockerill M
Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6763):721-2. PubMed ID: 10617188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Scientific publishing. Seeking advice on 'open access,' NIH gets an earful.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5685):764. PubMed ID: 15297639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Making research accessible: National Institutes of Health (NIH) public access and PNAS open access policies.
Cozzarelli NR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Apr; 102(15):5303. PubMed ID: 15809413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Scientific publishing. Publish and perish in the Internet world.
Marshall E
Science; 2000 Jul; 289(5477):223-5. PubMed ID: 10917835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Challenge for global e-journal project.
Sultzbaugh L
Nature; 1999 Nov; 402(6759):230. PubMed ID: 10580486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Towards a new horizon.
Mrowietz U
Arch Dermatol Res; 2008 Jan; 300(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17960401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The public-access movement.
Paquette M
Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2005; 41(2):49-50. PubMed ID: 15924574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Headache online.
Schwedt TJ; Roberts J
Headache; 2010 May; 50(5):736-7. PubMed ID: 20546319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Internet and scientific publishing.
van Mil F
Pharm World Sci; 2003 Dec; 25(6):243. PubMed ID: 14689809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Will cell alliance breed bureaucracy and leave contributors out?
Haggarty SJ; Ramalho-Santos M
Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6770):591. PubMed ID: 10688171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. National Institutes of Health ushers in new age of open-access publishing.
Brown D
J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 May; 105(5):696-7. PubMed ID: 15883541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Peer review at National Institutes of Health: small steps forward.
Johnston SC; Hauser SL
Ann Neurol; 2008 Nov; 64(5):A15-7. PubMed ID: 19067350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Mar; 16(3):390. PubMed ID: 18339262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
