233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10918790)
61. Electronic journal access: how does it affect the print subscription price?
Chen FL; Wrynn P; Rieke JL
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 2001 Oct; 89(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 11837258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Scientific publishing. Congress puts similar heat on NIH.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Jul; 305(5683):458. PubMed ID: 15273365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Open-access journal will publish first, judge later.
Giles J
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7123):9. PubMed ID: 17203032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Critics query financing of proposed 'E-Biomed'.
Wadman M
Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6741):200. PubMed ID: 10421350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Biomedical research publishing: radical changes ahead.
Bull World Health Organ; 1999; 77(7):610-1. PubMed ID: 10444886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Electronic publication of biomedical research.
Vidyashankar C; Sachdev HP
Indian Pediatr; 2000 May; 37(5):477-9. PubMed ID: 10820539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Open access publishing: a boon for scientific community.
Aqil M
Med Sci Monit; 2004 May; 10(5):LE5. PubMed ID: 15114277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Support for the NIH public access policy.
Rogawski MA; Suber P
Science; 2006 Sep; 313(5793):1572. PubMed ID: 16973859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Why are people reluctant to join in open review?
Liu SV
Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Shortening of NIH RO1 grant applications: your response is important.
Nairn RS; Sweasy JB
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jan; 6(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17157082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Public (open) access policy.
Schwartzkroin PA; Shorvon SD
Epilepsia; 2008 Aug; 49(8):1295. PubMed ID: 18754942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Scholarly publishing. NIH flooded with comments on public access proposal.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5701):1451. PubMed ID: 15567819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. PubMed Central decentralized.
Sequeira E; McEntyre J; Lipman D
Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6830):740. PubMed ID: 11298409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Scientific publishing. NIH proposes 6-month public access to papers.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5690):1548. PubMed ID: 15361594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Revamp for NIH grants.
Wadman M
Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7182):1035. PubMed ID: 18305502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Growing pains for NIH grant review.
Bonetta L
Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. NIH launches new publishing website.
Public Health Rep; 1999; 114(6):492. PubMed ID: 10670615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. EMBO backs single electronic repository. European Molecular Biology Organization.
Butler D
Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):97. PubMed ID: 10408426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Open access and you.
Schnoor JL
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Apr; 39(7):143A. PubMed ID: 15871214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. NIH E-biomed proposal: a welcome jolt.
Lancet; 1999 Jun; 353(9169):1985. PubMed ID: 10376606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
