These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10918802)
1. [Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM Statement]. Moher D; Cook DJ; Eastwood S; Olkin I; Rennie D; Stroup DF Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2000; 74(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 10918802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group. Moher D; Cook DJ; Eastwood S; Olkin I; Rennie D; Stroup DF Br J Surg; 2000 Nov; 87(11):1448-54. PubMed ID: 11091231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement. Moher D; Cook DJ; Eastwood S; Olkin I; Rennie D; Stroup DF Onkologie; 2000 Dec; 23(6):597-602. PubMed ID: 11441269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Moher D; Cook DJ; Eastwood S; Olkin I; Rennie D; Stroup DF Lancet; 1999 Nov; 354(9193):1896-900. PubMed ID: 10584742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders. Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study. Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT). Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety by modifying the CONSORT statement. O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Gardner IA; Dickson JS; Torrence ME; ; Dewey CE; Dohoo IR; Evans RB; Gray JT; Greiner M; Keefe G; Lefebvre SL; Morley PS; Ramirez A; Sischo W; Smith DR; Snedeker K; Sofos J; Ward MP; Wills R Zoonoses Public Health; 2010 Mar; 57(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 20070653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A standard method for reporting ramdomized medical scientific research; the 'Consolidation of the standards of reporting trials' (CONSORT)]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 May; 142(19):1089-91. PubMed ID: 9623225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety. O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Gardner IA; Dickson JS; Torrence ME; Dewey CE; Dohoo IR; Evans RB; Gray JT; Greiner M; Keefe G; Lefebvre SL; Morley PS; Ramirez A; Sischo W; Smith DR; Snedeker K; Sofos J; Ward MP; Wills R Prev Vet Med; 2010 Jan; 93(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 19926151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group. Shea B; Bouter LM; Grimshaw JM; Francis D; Ortiz Z; Wells GA; Tugwell PS; Boers M J Rheumatol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16267878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility. Dias S; McNamee R; Vail A Hum Reprod; 2006 Oct; 21(10):2617-27. PubMed ID: 16793995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus. Boutron I; Moher D; Tugwell P; Giraudeau B; Poiraudeau S; Nizard R; Ravaud P J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1233-40. PubMed ID: 16291467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of pneumonia in China]. Hou ZK; Li JS; Yu XQ; Li B; Zhou HY; Zhang YX Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Apr; 21(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 19374786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The REFLECT statement: reporting guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in livestock and food safety: explanation and elaboration. Sargeant JM; O'Connor AM; Gardner IA; Dickson JS; Torrence ME; Zoonoses Public Health; 2010 Mar; 57(2):105-36. PubMed ID: 20070652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature. Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Manns B; Laupland KB; Doig CJ Crit Care; 2005 Oct; 9(5):R575-82. PubMed ID: 16277721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality assessment of meta-analyses of RCTs of pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorder. Hemels ME; Vicente C; Sadri H; Masson MJ; Einarson TR Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Apr; 20(4):477-84. PubMed ID: 15119985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]