These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10919224)

  • 21. Evaluation of monoclonal anti-Rh antibodies as reagents for blood grouping and for the identification of red cell membrane components associated with Rh antigen activity.
    Moore S; Green C; McGowan A
    Rev Fr Transfus Immunohematol; 1988 Apr; 31(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 3145542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Irregular agglutinins and the compatibility test: the elements of choice].
    Rouger P; Salmon C
    Rev Fr Transfus Immunohematol; 1983 Feb; 26(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 6407087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Irregular erythrocytic antibodies as an obstacle to transfusion].
    Uhlig R; Endert G; Lammel G
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1984; 78(20):849-52. PubMed ID: 6523909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multiplex blood group typing by cellular surface plasmon resonance imaging.
    Szittner Z; Bentlage AEH; van der Donk E; Ligthart PC; Lissenberg-Thunnissen S; van der Schoot CE; Vidarsson G
    Transfusion; 2019 Feb; 59(2):754-761. PubMed ID: 30488958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Problem-solving in immunohematology: direct compatibility laboratory test ].
    Mannessier L; Roubinet F; Chiaroni J
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2001 Dec; 8(6):481-4. PubMed ID: 11802611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [When A is not A anymore: problems and pitfalls with blood group typing].
    Möhnle P; Humpe A; Wittmann G
    Anaesthesist; 2018 Sep; 67(9):637-646. PubMed ID: 30171285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [(Partially) automated gel techniques for determining erythrocyte antigens and antibodies].
    Kreutzig B; Weisshaar D
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1993; 31():152-6. PubMed ID: 7693245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Proof of homologous blood transfusion through quantification of blood group antigens.
    Nelson M; Popp H; Sharpe K; Ashenden M
    Haematologica; 2003 Nov; 88(11):1284-95. PubMed ID: 14607758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The future of blood groups and other markers in reference laboratories.
    Rouger P; Le Pennec PY
    Transfus Clin Biol; 1995; 2(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 8542032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors influencing antibody detection with the DiaMed gel antiglobulin test.
    Cornish C; Flower R
    Transfus Med; 2003 Aug; 13(4):243-4. PubMed ID: 12880396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative sensitivity of solid phase versus PEG enhancement assays for detection and identification of RBC antibodies.
    Dwyre DM; Erickson Y; Heintz M; Elbert C; Strauss RG
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2006 Aug; 35(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 16905362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Solid phase technique versus gel centrifugation for detection of erythrocyte antibodies--a prospective study comparison the 2 antibody detection tests].
    Zeiler T; Thiele S; Kretschmer V
    Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1996; 33():17-21. PubMed ID: 8974691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance of an automated solid-phase red cell adherence system compared with that of a manual gel microcolumn assay for the identification of antibodies eluted from red blood cells.
    Finck RH; Davis RJ; Teng S; Goldfinger D; Ziman AF; Lu Q; Yuan S
    Immunohematology; 2011; 27(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 22356479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme in Blood Group Serology. ABO and D grouping, antibody screening, direct antiglobulin test and antibody identification 1984-1985.
    Holburn AM; Prior DM; Whitton CM
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1988; 10(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 3130215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is a computer crossmatch in the absence of an immediate-spin antibody screen adequate for persons identified to be at increased risk of forming new blood group antibodies?
    Sandler SG; Abedalthagafi M; Langeberg A
    Transfusion; 2008 Oct; 48(10):2265-6. PubMed ID: 18928510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [From immunohematology to molecular biology].
    Rouger P
    Transfus Clin Biol; 1998 Apr; 5 Suppl 1():42S-46S. PubMed ID: 9622845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multi-centre evaluation of pre-transfusional routine tests using 8-column format gel cards (DG Gel®).
    Taylor J; Hyare J; Stelfox P; Williams M; Lees R; Maley M
    Transfus Med; 2011 Apr; 21(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 21118316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automated detection of red cell antibodies in donor sera using an automated technology.
    Theuriere M; Zelenski KR; Moore VK; Logulo AC
    Transfusion; 1985; 25(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 4002312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Immunological approach of anti-H (9), anti-Lewis (6), anti-P (3) and anti-Pr (1) monoclonal antibodies.
    Rouger P; Tsikas G; Gane P; Oriol R; Salmon C
    Rev Fr Transfus Immunohematol; 1987 Dec; 30(5):663-9. PubMed ID: 3452908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Noncellular immunoadsorbents for preparing typing sera that recognize high-frequency red cell antigens.
    Gee SW; Lubenko A
    Transfusion; 1988; 28(6):556-8. PubMed ID: 3057683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.