BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10921199)

  • 1. Film based scatter measurement in mammography.
    McLean D; Ainley L; Blackett K
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2000 Mar; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 10921199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from use of Monte Carlo simulations and comparison to physical measurements.
    Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111914. PubMed ID: 25370647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results.
    Boone JM; Lindfors KK; Cooper VN; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 2000 Oct; 27(10):2408-16. PubMed ID: 11099211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo simulation of a mammographic test phantom.
    Hunt RA; Dance DR; Pachoud M; Alm Carlsson G; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):432-5. PubMed ID: 15933151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scatter dose calculation for anti-scatter linear grids in mammography.
    Al Kafi MA; Maalej N; Naqvi AA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Oct; 67(10):1837-41. PubMed ID: 19632851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An edge spread technique for measurement of the scatter-to-primary ratio in mammography.
    Cooper VN; Boone JM; Seibert JA; Pellot-Barakat CJ
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):845-53. PubMed ID: 10841386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scatter correction in digital mammography based on image deconvolution.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1295-309. PubMed ID: 20134081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of scattered radiation in projection mammography: four practical methods compared.
    Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3167-80. PubMed ID: 22755701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scatter/primary in mammography: Monte Carlo validation.
    Boone JM; Cooper VN
    Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1818-31. PubMed ID: 10984229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone and mucosal dosimetry in skin radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study using kilovoltage photon and megavoltage electron beams.
    Chow JC; Jiang R
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3885-99. PubMed ID: 22642985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from physical measurements.
    Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061901. PubMed ID: 24877812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scattered radiation in scanning slot mammography.
    Jing Z; Huda W; Walker JK
    Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1111-7. PubMed ID: 9682196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of scatter-to-primary ratio, grid performance and normalized average glandular dose in mammography by Monte Carlo simulation including interference and energy broadening effects.
    Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):4335-59. PubMed ID: 20647608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
    Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast composition and radiographic breast equivalence.
    McLean D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Mar; 20(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9141308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. X-ray properties of an anthropomorphic breast phantom for MRI and x-ray imaging.
    Freed M; Badal A; Jennings RJ; de las Heras H; Myers KJ; Badano A
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 56(12):3513-33. PubMed ID: 21606556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grid and slot scan scatter reduction in mammography: comparison by using Monte Carlo techniques.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA; Tang CM; Lane SM
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):519-27. PubMed ID: 11818623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scanning slit chest radiography: a practical and efficient scatter control design.
    Barnes GT; Wu X; Sanders PC
    Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):525-8. PubMed ID: 8284410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compact x-ray sources for mammographic applications: Monte Carlo simulations of image quality.
    Oliva P; Golosio B; Stumbo S; Bravin A; Tomassini P
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5149-61. PubMed ID: 19994525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.