87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10921199)
21. A semi-empirical model for scatter field reduction in digital mammography.
Marimón E; Marsden PA; Nait-Charif H; Díaz O
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(4):045001. PubMed ID: 33296884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Guidelines for anti-scatter grid use in pediatric digital radiography.
Fritz S; Jones AK
Pediatr Radiol; 2014 Mar; 44(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 24281685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mammography grid performance.
Rezentes PS; de Almeida A; Barnes GT
Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9885613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the quantitative accuracy of a commercially available positron emission mammography scanner.
Springer A; Mawlawi OR
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2132-9. PubMed ID: 21626946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Direct measurement and analytical modeling of scatter in portal imaging.
Spies L; Evans PM; Partridge M; Hansen VN; Bortfeld T
Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):462-71. PubMed ID: 10757598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Monte Carlo study of grid performance in diagnostic radiology: factors which affect the selection of tube potential and grid ratio.
Sandborg M; Dance DR; Carlsson GA; Persliden J
Br J Radiol; 1993 Dec; 66(792):1164-76. PubMed ID: 8293262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A scatter correction method for dual-energy digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation.
Ai K; Gao Y; Yu G
J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(5):653-71. PubMed ID: 25265925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of phantom type, beam quality, field size and field position on X-ray scattering simulated using Monte Carlo techniques.
McVey G
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):130-41. PubMed ID: 16489194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Composition of mammographic phantom materials.
Geise RA; Palchevsky A
Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 8596830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Experimental verification of a technique for predicting scattered radiation transfer: application to low photon energies.
Bernstein H; Muntz EP
Med Phys; 1986; 13(6):836-42. PubMed ID: 3796480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Monte Carlo study of the energy spectra and transmission characteristics of scattered radiation from x-ray computed tomography.
Platten DJ
J Radiol Prot; 2014 Jun; 34(2):445-56. PubMed ID: 24894101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Entrance skin exposure and mean glandular dose: effect of scatter and field gradient at mammography.
Ng KH; Aus RJ; DeWerd LA; Vetter JR
Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 9356619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Investigation of the dose distribution for a cone beam CT system dedicated to breast imaging.
Lanconelli N; Mettivier G; Lo Meo S; Russo P
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 22763280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Scatter radiation intensities about mammography units.
Simpkin DJ
Health Phys; 1996 Feb; 70(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 8567292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Design of linear anti-scatter grid geometry with optimum performance for screen-film and digital mammography systems.
Khodajou-Chokami H; Sohrabpour M
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):5753-65. PubMed ID: 26159575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The measurement of backscatter factors of kilovoltage X-ray beams using Gafchromic™ EBT2 film.
Smith L; Hill R; Nakano M; Kim J; Kuncic Z
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2011 Jun; 34(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 21533591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Scatter radiation in mammography.
Simeoni RJ; Thiele DL
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1993 Mar; 16(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8470995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Scatter reduction in mammography with air gap.
Krol A; Bassano DA; Chamberlain CC; Prasad SC
Med Phys; 1996 Jul; 23(7):1263-70. PubMed ID: 8839422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The scatter-to-primary ratio as a function of varying X-ray absorption measured by computed radiography.
Miettunen R; Korhola O; Savikurki S
Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 1743195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
