These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10921219)

  • 1. Interobserver agreement of the Nottingham histologic grading scheme for infiltrating duct carcinoma breast.
    Sikka M; Agarwal S; Bhatia A
    Indian J Cancer; 1999; 36(2-4):149-53. PubMed ID: 10921219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma.
    Frierson HF; Wolber RA; Berean KW; Franquemont DW; Gaffey MJ; Boyd JC; Wilbur DC
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Feb; 103(2):195-8. PubMed ID: 7856562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histologic grading of invasive lobular carcinoma: does use of a 2-tiered nuclear grading system improve interobserver variability?
    Adams AL; Chhieng DC; Bell WC; Winokur T; Hameed O
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Aug; 13(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 19608079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of histologic grade of breast carcinoma with cytologic features on fine-needle aspiration of the breast.
    Ducatman BS; Emery ST; Wang HH
    Mod Pathol; 1993 Sep; 6(5):539-43. PubMed ID: 8248109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histologic grading of breast cancer: linkage of patient outcome with level of pathologist agreement.
    Dalton LW; Pinder SE; Elston CE; Ellis IO; Page DL; Dupont WD; Blamey RW
    Mod Pathol; 2000 Jul; 13(7):730-5. PubMed ID: 10912931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A newly proposed semi-automated method of grading invasive lobular carcinoma: a unifying concept and correlation with prognostic markers and patient survival.
    Stevens E; Kimler BF; Davis MK; Fan F; Thomas P; Wang XY; Damjanov I; Tawfik OW
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2009; 39(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 19201737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histological grading of breast carcinomas: a study of interobserver agreement.
    Robbins P; Pinder S; de Klerk N; Dawkins H; Harvey J; Sterrett G; Ellis I; Elston C
    Hum Pathol; 1995 Aug; 26(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 7635449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does routine grading of invasive lobular cancer of the breast have the same prognostic significance as for ductal cancers?
    Sinha PS; Bendall S; Bates T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Dec; 26(8):733-7. PubMed ID: 11087636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cytopathological grading, as a predictor of histopathological grade, in ductal carcinoma (NOS) of breast, on air-dried Diff-Quik smears.
    Khan MZ; Haleem A; Al Hassani H; Kfoury H
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Oct; 29(4):185-93. PubMed ID: 14506669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the prognostic value of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson and Nottingham histological grades in a series of 825 cases of breast cancer: major importance of the mitotic count as a component of both grading systems.
    Genestie C; Zafrani B; Asselain B; Fourquet A; Rozan S; Validire P; Vincent-Salomon A; Sastre-Garau X
    Anticancer Res; 1998; 18(1B):571-6. PubMed ID: 9568179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative and evaluative study of cytological and histological grading system profile in malignant neoplasm of breast--an important prognostic factor.
    Meena SP; Hemrajani DK; Joshi N
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 49(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 16933714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Interobserver reproducibility in the pathologic diagnosis of borderline ductal proliferative breast diseases].
    Wei B; Bu H; Zhu CR; Guo LX; Chen HJ; Zhao C; Zhang P; Chen DY; Tang Y; Jiang Y
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Nov; 35(6):849-53. PubMed ID: 15573772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
    Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative predictive value of three prognostic markers--S-phase fraction, PCNA and Mitotic count on axillary lymph node metastasis in carcinoma breast.
    Pervez S; Khan MN; Nasir MI
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2007; 19(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 17867469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interobserver agreement of a probabilistic approach to reporting breast fine-needle aspirations on ThinPrep.
    Gornstein B; Jacobs T; Bédard Y; Biscotti C; Ducatman B; Layfield L; McKee G; Sneige N; Wang H
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Jun; 30(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 15176025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cytohistological correlation of grading in breast carcinoma.
    Lingegowda JB; MuddeGowda PH; Ramakantha CK; Chandrasekar HR
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Apr; 39(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 21416638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of an increase in grading categories and double reporting on the reliability of breast cancer grade.
    Chowdhury N; Pai MR; Lobo FD; Kini H; Varghese R
    APMIS; 2007 Apr; 115(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 17504304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson tumor grading system to fine-needle aspirates of the breast.
    Howell LP; Gandour-Edwards R; O'Sullivan D
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Mar; 101(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 8135179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between tumor grade and computed architectural complexity in breast cancer specimens.
    Tambasco M; Magliocco AM
    Hum Pathol; 2008 May; 39(5):740-6. PubMed ID: 18439940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality control for histological grading in breast cancer: an Italian experience.
    Italian Network for Quality Assurance of Tumour Biomarkers (INQAT) Group
    Pathologica; 2005 Feb; 97(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15918409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.