61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10921284)
21. High-resolution computer display of portable, digital, chest radiographs of adults: suitability for primary interpretation.
Frank MS; Jost RG; Molina PL; Anderson DJ; Solomon SL; Whitman RA; Moore SM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):473-7. PubMed ID: 8430538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System.
Goodman LR; Foley WD; Wilson CR; Rimm AA; Lawson TL
Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 3940392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of monitor luminance and room illumination on soft-copy reading evaluation with electronically generated contrast-detail phantom: comparison of cathode-ray tube monitor with liquid crystal display.
Muramoto H; Shimamoto K; Ikeda M; Koyama K; Fukushima H; Ishigaki T
Nagoya J Med Sci; 2006 Jun; 68(3-4):115-20. PubMed ID: 16967777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of ambient light variations on luminance ratio of CRT monitor and image contrast in ultrasonography.
Hatanaka S; Morishita J; Chishaki A; Noguchi Y; Hokazono E; Komiya Y; Higashida Y; Shimanoe Y; Nakamura K; Tashiro H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Nov; 65(11):1512-8. PubMed ID: 20019431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Visual evoked potentials with CRT and LCD monitors: when newer is not better.
Husain AM; Hayes S; Young M; Shah D
Neurology; 2009 Jan; 72(2):162-4. PubMed ID: 19139368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Statistical method in a comparative study in which the standard treatment is superior to others.
Ikeda M; Shimamoto K; Ishigaki T; Yamauchi K
Nagoya J Med Sci; 2002 Nov; 65(3-4):127-32. PubMed ID: 12580539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.
Woodard PK; Slone RM; Gierada DS; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 9122392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Conventional radiology, digital radiology with photostimulable phosphor, laser digitalization of thoracic radiographic films at the bedside. A comparative study].
Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Guidarelli G; Sartoni Galloni S
Radiol Med; 1992 Oct; 84(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 1455031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [The reduction of the radiation dosage by means of storage phosphor-film radiography compared to a conventional film-screen system with a grid cassette on a skull phantom].
Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Freesmeyer M; Jonetz-Mentzel L; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10464506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Digital luminescence radiography in comparison with the conventional film-screen technique in diagnosis of fractures].
Fink U; Schwerdtfeger J; Fink BK; Schätzl M; Reiser M
Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 8645859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Comparative findings of digital thoracic images and digital images of statistical phantoms as film copy, a radiological work station and a PC].
Ricke J; Wolf M; Zielinski C; Hosten N; Liebig T; Amthauer H; Hänninen EL; Schumacher T; Stroszczynski C; Bergh B; Emmel D; Schauer W
Rofo; 1998 Mar; 168(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 9551113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Digital selenium radiography: a comparison of the picture quality of thoracic images in normal and reduced image formats based on the structural anatomical details].
Zähringer M; Krug B; Kamm KF; Jung G; Dölken W; Wassmer G; Lackner K
Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9711280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Digital luminescence radiography. A new method of study in thoracic diagnosis at the intensive care unit].
Witte G; Pothmann W; Bause H; Nicolas V; Schulte am Esch J; Bücheler E
Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed; 1989 Feb; 24(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 2653089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The value of the supine chest x-ray with digital luminescence radiography in relation to the experience of the observer. A ROC analysis in CT-validated cases].
Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Strayle M; Linstedt-Hilden M; Dietz K; Deusch H; Hoffmann W; Claussen CD
Rofo; 1994 Jul; 161(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8043760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computed vs. film-screen magnification radiography of fingers in hyperparathyroidism. An ROC analysis.
Jónsson A; Hannesson P; Herrlin K; Jonsson K; Andersen R; Pettersson H
Acta Radiol; 1995 May; 36(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 7742125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of observer performance reading from a video CRT vs. reading from film.
Keyes JW; Kline RC; Resinger WW; Rose EA; Koral KF; Rogers WL
Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(3):298-300. PubMed ID: 6618820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
