These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1092149)

  • 1. Clinical application of a second generation electrocardiographic computer program.
    Pipberger HV; McCaughan D; Littmann D; Pipberger HA; Cornfield J; Dunn RA; Batchlor CD; Berson AS
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 May; 35(5):597-608. PubMed ID: 1092149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of an ECG computer analysis program on the cardiologist's interpretation. A cooperative study.
    Milliken JA; Pipberger H; Pipberger HV; Araoye MA; Ari R; Burggraf GW; Fletcher RD; Katz RJ; Lopez EA; McCans JL; Silver AM
    J Electrocardiol; 1983 Apr; 16(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 6222129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [ECG evaluation by the computer using the USPHS program (author's transl)].
    So CS
    MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1975 Aug; 117(34):1339-44. PubMed ID: 126374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of automated processing of electrocardiograms by the Veterans Administration program (AVA 3.4).
    Brohet CR; Richman HG
    Am J Cardiol; 1979 Jun; 43(6):1167-74. PubMed ID: 155985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic criteria for computer-aided electrocardiographic 15-lead system. Evaluation using 12 leads and Frank orthogonal leads with vector display.
    Talbot S; Dreifus LS; Watanabe Y; Chiang R; Morris K; Reich M
    Br Heart J; 1976 Dec; 38(12):1247-61. PubMed ID: 137730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The program of the cooperative study of the Veterans Administration.
    Cornfield J; Pipberger HV; Dunn RA
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975; 5(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 126890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy of a 15-lead hybrid computer-aided electrocardiographic system.
    Talbot S; Dreifus LS; Watanabe Y; Reich M; Chiang R; Morris K
    Eur J Cardiol; 1973 Sep; 1(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 4618198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinicians, the Mount Sinai program and the Veterans' Administration program evaluated against clinico-pathological data derived independently of the electrocardiogram.
    Bourdillon PJ; Kilpatrick D
    Eur J Cardiol; 1978 Nov; 8(4-5):395-412. PubMed ID: 152709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Fully automatic computer-analysis of electrocardiograms in clinical routine (author's transl)].
    Mengden HJ; Just H; Kaspar W; Löllgen H; Kersting F
    Z Kardiol; 1978 Oct; 67(10):707-16. PubMed ID: 366940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Role of ambulatory ECG in the diagnostic work of a cardiology division].
    Sozzi G; Brusoni B; Lunati M; Piccalò G; Gadaleta G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1987 Dec; 17(12):1051-4. PubMed ID: 3503800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Non-invasive diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases].
    Fazzini PF; Antoniucci D
    Ann Ital Med Int; 1986 Jun; 1(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 3079361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Pro and con: non-invasive or invasive diagnosis in cardiology. Arguments for a non-invasive procedure].
    Blömer H
    Internist (Berl); 1981 Nov; 22(11):664-71. PubMed ID: 7031005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The value of the computer as a screening tool for routine electrocardiograms.
    Verdesca AS
    J Occup Med; 1972 Apr; 14(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 4553521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Brohet C; Degani R; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of diagnostic results by a multivariate computer ECG analysis program (AVA 3.5).
    Willems JL; Pardaens J
    Eur J Cardiol; 1977; 6(3):229-43. PubMed ID: 338306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The evaluation of test methods in the clinical diagnosis of heart diseases (invasive procedures)].
    Riecker G
    Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med; 1977 Apr 17-21; 83():592-603. PubMed ID: 612041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement of automated electrocardiographic diagnosis by combination of computer interpretations of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.
    Kors JA; van Herpen G; Willems JL; van Bemmel JH
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 Jul; 70(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 1615877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Algorithmization of the medical method of electrocardiographic analysis].
    Ianushkevichus ZI; Vitenshteĭnas GA; Kalashaĭtite LI; Valuzhis KK; Iapertas VP
    Kardiologiia; 1972 Mar; 12(3):29-34. PubMed ID: 4639506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Significance of the corrected orthogonal and conventional electrocardiography in clinical practice].
    Giegler I; Rübesamen M; Grossmann K; Lehmann K; Schambach H; Lewin C
    Z Kardiol; 1974 Nov; 63(11):1023-33. PubMed ID: 4281192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of synthesized standard 12 leads and Frank vector leads.
    Wolf HK; Rautaharju PM; Unite VC; Stewart J
    Adv Cardiol; 1976; 16():87-97. PubMed ID: 132110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.