These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10922149)
1. Chemical cleaning of titanium tray for reconstructive surgery. Cheung LK; Luk WK Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Aug; 38(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 10922149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of cleaning surgical implants: quantitative analysis of contaminant removal. Rowland SA; Shalaby SW; Latour RA; von Recum AF J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 7703533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surface roughness and fatigue performance of commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy after different polishing protocols. Guilherme AS; Henriques GE; Zavanelli RA; Mesquita MF J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 15798689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surface analysis of four dental implant systems. Olefjord I; Hansson S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 8468084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Polishing of titanium prosthetics (Part 6). The chemical polishing baths containing hydrofluoric acid and nitric acid]. Tamaki Y; Miyazaki T; Suzuki E; Miyaji T Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Jan; 8(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 2557680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of post-etching cleaning and connecting porcelain on the microtensile bond strength of composite resin to feldspathic porcelain. Magne P; Cascione D J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 17098499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reuse of healing abutments: an in vitro model of plasma cleaning and common sterilization techniques. Vezeau PJ; Keller JC; Wightman JP Implant Dent; 2000; 9(3):236-46. PubMed ID: 11307410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of pre-soaking and time in the ultrasonic cleaner on the cleanliness of sterilized endodontic files. Aasim SA; Mellor AC; Qualtrough AJ Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 16454795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interventional evaluation of environmental contamination by vancomycin-resistant enterococci: failure of personnel, product, or procedure? Hota B; Blom DW; Lyle EA; Weinstein RA; Hayden MK J Hosp Infect; 2009 Feb; 71(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19108932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cellular retention on diagnostic contact lenses: an evaluation of current cleaning protocol. MacRae M; Bax G; Dhillon B Eye (Lond); 2007 Nov; 21(11):1384-6. PubMed ID: 16888641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tackling contamination of the hospital environment by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a comparison between conventional terminal cleaning and hydrogen peroxide vapour decontamination. French GL; Otter JA; Shannon KP; Adams NM; Watling D; Parks MJ J Hosp Infect; 2004 May; 57(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15142713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of various cleaning methods to remove bacillus spores from spacecraft hardware materials. Venkateswaran K; Chung S; Allton J; Kern R Astrobiology; 2004; 4(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 15383241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of prion decontamination protocols on nickel-titanium rotary surfaces. Sonntag D; Peters OA J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 17368335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cleaning endodontic files in a washer disinfector. Assaf M; Mellor AC; Qualtrough AJ Br Dent J; 2008 May; 204(10):E17; discussion 562-3. PubMed ID: 18493255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An XPS and SEM evaluation of six chemical and physical techniques for cleaning of contaminated titanium implants. Mouhyi J; Sennerby L; Pireaux JJ; Dourov N; Nammour S; Van Reck J Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Jun; 9(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 10530133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The use of a thermomechanical cleaning procedure for removal of residual particles of corund blasted or glass bead peened implants in total hip arthoplasty]. Schuh A; Uter W; Holzwarth U; Kachler W; Göske J; Müller T Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Aug; 130(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 16103960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of techniques for cleaning endodontic files after usage: a quantitative scanning electron microscopic study. Ferreira Murgel CA; Walton RE; Rittman B; Pecora JD J Endod; 1990 May; 16(5):214-7. PubMed ID: 2074413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of investment material type on the contamination zone and mechanical properties of commercially pure titanium castings. Eliopoulos D; Zinelis S; Papadopoulos T J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):539-48. PubMed ID: 16316800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 2. In vitro experiments. Cassinelli C; Morra M; Bruzzone G; Carpi A; Di Santi G; Giardino R; Fini M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 12608668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]