These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1092293)
1. Accuracy of the Bing and Rinne tuning fork tests. Wilson WR; Woods LA Arch Otolaryngol; 1975 Feb; 101(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 1092293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test. Burkey JM; Lippy WH; Schuring AG; Rizer FM Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9455950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the Weber and Rinne tuning fork tests in evaluation of children with otitis media with effusion. Behn A; Westerberg BD; Zhang H; Riding KH; Ludemann JP; Kozak FK J Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 17942032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rinne revisited: steel versus aluminum tuning forks. MacKechnie CA; Greenberg JJ; Gerkin RC; McCall AA; Hirsch BE; Durrant JD; Raz Y Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 24085711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Rinne test for conductive deafness. A critical reappraisal. Chole RA; Cook GB Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1988 Apr; 114(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 3348896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. C1-tuning fork tests in school-aged children. Haapaniemi JJ; Suonpää JT; Salmivalli AJ; Virolainen ES Auris Nasus Larynx; 1996; 23():26-32. PubMed ID: 8809320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Bing test in the detection of conductive hearing impairment. Swan IR; Browning GG Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1989 Dec; 14(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 2692884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rinne test: does the tuning fork position affect the sound amplitude at the ear? Butskiy O; Ng D; Hodgson M; Nunez DA J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 45():21. PubMed ID: 27013057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss. Miltenburg DM J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 7996624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical precision of the Rinne test. Gelfand SA Acta Otolaryngol; 1977; 83(5-6):480-7. PubMed ID: 888683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The early descriptions of the so-called tuning-fork tests of Weber, Rinne, Schwabach, and Bing. III. The development of the Schwabach and Bing tests. Huizing EH ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1975; 37(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 1093082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The early descriptions of the so-called tuning-fork tests of Weber, Rinne, Schwabach, and Bing. II. The "Rhine Test" and its first description by Polansky. Huizing EH ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1975; 37(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 1093081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of a smartphone-based Rinne test to detect an air-bone gap. Hibscher D; Oron Y; Handzel O; Warshavsky A; Horowitz G; Ungar OJ Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 278(12):4767-4773. PubMed ID: 33454812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Physical diagnostic procedures: whispered speech and tuning fork test]. Grote JJ; de Laat JA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(32):1816-9. PubMed ID: 9856153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Rinne test: its use in predicting magnitude of conductive hearing loss. White JF Laryngoscope; 1974 Mar; 84(3):459-67. PubMed ID: 4814416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Accuracy of Tuning Fork Tests for Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review. Kelly EA; Li B; Adams ME Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Aug; 159(2):220-230. PubMed ID: 29661046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The tuning fork--an essential instrument in otologic practice. Doyle PJ; Anderson DW; Pijl S J Otolaryngol; 1984 Apr; 13(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 6726852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]