These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1092293)
21. Stapedectomy for far-advanced otosclerosis. Shea PF; Ge X; Shea JJ Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 10431881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Combined tuning fork tests in hearing loss: explorative clinical study of the patterns. Vikram KB; Naseeruddin K J Otolaryngol; 2004 Aug; 33(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 15903203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [History of the tuning fork. II: Evolution of the classical experiments by Weber, Rinne and Schwabach]. Feldmann H Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):318-26. PubMed ID: 9280421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery. Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A reevaluation of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test as a patient selection criterion for laser stapedotomy. Gordon MA; Silverstein H; Willcox TO; Rosenberg SI Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):712-7. PubMed ID: 9831142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Tuning fork study in deafness. Thus function Rinne and Weber tests]. Ziemer C MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Apr; 148(15):18. PubMed ID: 16711196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical role of informal tests of hearing. Browning GG; Swan IR; Chew KK J Laryngol Otol; 1989 Jan; 103(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 2646384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Rinne tuning fork test. Swan IR Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1989 Sep; 24(9A):99-102. PubMed ID: 2506208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Does this patient have hearing impairment? Bagai A; Thavendiranathan P; Detsky AS JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(4):416-28. PubMed ID: 16434632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A new modification of the Rinne test. Johnston DF Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1992 Aug; 17(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 1526051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sudden deafness and tuning fork tests: towards optimal utilisation. Bayoumy AB; de Ru JA Pract Neurol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):66-68. PubMed ID: 31444233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [The importance of tuning forks]. Reiss M; Reiss G Praxis (Bern 1994); 2002 Jan; 91(1-2):17-9. PubMed ID: 11824141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Rinne Test Results: How Badly Can We Be Mistaken? Wrobel MJ; Bogacz BF OTO Open; 2021; 5(1):2473974X21996998. PubMed ID: 33786411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The otologist's tuning fork examination--are you striking it correctly? Stevens JR; Pfannenstiel TJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Mar; 152(3):477-9. PubMed ID: 25475500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Value of preliminary hearing tests]. Reiss M; Reiss G Wien Med Wochenschr; 2003; 153(3-4):73-5. PubMed ID: 12658966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Audiometric Weber and Rinne tests as compared to pure-tone thresholds. Thompson AK J S Afr Speech Hear Assoc; 1974 Dec; 21(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 4455912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]