416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10922984)
1. Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis.
Weyant MJ; Eachempati SR; Maluccio MA; Rivadeneira DE; Grobmyer SR; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
Surgery; 2000 Aug; 128(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 10922984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective evaluation of the use of emergency department computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis.
Maluccio MA; Covey AM; Weyant MJ; Eachempati SR; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2001; 2(3):205-11; discussion 211-4. PubMed ID: 12593710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients.
Rhea JT; Halpern EF; Ptak T; Lawrason JN; Sacknoff R; Novelline RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1802-8. PubMed ID: 15908534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When should we order a CT scan and when should we rely on the results to diagnose an acute appendicitis?
Ceydeli A; Lavotshkin S; Yu J; Wise L
Curr Surg; 2006; 63(6):464-8. PubMed ID: 17084779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis: accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay.
Foley TA; Earnest F; Nathan MA; Hough DM; Schiller HJ; Hoskin TL
Radiology; 2005 Apr; 235(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 15749978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children does not influence the overall rate of negative appendectomy or perforation.
Weyant MJ; Eachempati SR; Maluccio MA; Spigland N; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2001; 2(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12594877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings.
Kessler N; Cyteval C; Gallix B; Lesnik A; Blayac PM; Pujol J; Bruel JM; Taourel P
Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):472-8. PubMed ID: 14688403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Independent predictors of acute appendicitis on CT with pathologic correlation.
Ives EP; Sung S; McCue P; Durrani H; Halpern EJ
Acad Radiol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):996-1003. PubMed ID: 18620120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acute Appendicitis: Use of Clinical and CT Findings for Modeling Hospital Resource Utilization.
Viradia NK; Gaing B; Kang SK; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):W275-82. PubMed ID: 26295663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiation of early perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: MDCT findings, MDCT diagnostic performance, and clinical outcome.
Kim MS; Park HW; Park JY; Park HJ; Lee SY; Hong HP; Kwag HJ; Kwon HJ
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 24633221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection.
Bixby SD; Lucey BC; Soto JA; Theysohn JM; Ozonoff A; Varghese JC
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):780-6. PubMed ID: 17114626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of CT findings in differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis.
Suthikeeree W; Lertdomrongdej L; Charoensak A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93(12):1422-9. PubMed ID: 21344805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging.
Wise SW; Labuski MR; Kasales CJ; Blebea JS; Meilstrup JW; Holley GP; LaRusso SA; Holliman J; Ruggiero FM; Mauger D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):933-41. PubMed ID: 11264081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acute appendicitis: relationships between CT-determined severities and serum white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels.
Kim HC; Yang DM; Lee CM; Jin W; Nam DH; Song JY; Kim JY
Br J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 84(1008):1115-20. PubMed ID: 21123307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of outcome for children with perforated appendicitis initially treated with non-operative management.
Nadler EP; Reblock KK; Vaughan KG; Meza MP; Ford HR; Gaines BA
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2004; 5(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 15744126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study.
Coursey CA; Nelson RC; Patel MB; Cochran C; Dodd LG; Delong DM; Beam CA; Vaslef S
Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):460-8. PubMed ID: 20093517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound, computed tomography, and laboratory findings in the diagnosis of appendicitis.
Johansson EP; Rydh A; Riklund KA
Acta Radiol; 2007 Apr; 48(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 17453494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acute appendicitis in children: comparison of clinical diagnosis with ultrasound and CT imaging.
Karakas SP; Guelfguat M; Leonidas JC; Springer S; Singh SP
Pediatr Radiol; 2000 Feb; 30(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 10663520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations.
Rao PM; Rhea JT; Novelline RA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 9294553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources.
Rao PM; Rhea JT; Novelline RA; Mostafavi AA; McCabe CJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 9428814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
