180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10923147)
1. [Practice of systematic reviews. VII. Pooling of results from observational studies].
Zeegers MP; Heisterkamp SH; Kostense PJ; van der Windt DA; Scholten RJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jul; 144(29):1393-7. PubMed ID: 10923147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis].
Scholten RJ; Assendelft WJ; Kostense PJ; Bouter LM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):843-8. PubMed ID: 10347653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests.
Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM; Heisterkamp SH
Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1525-37. PubMed ID: 12111918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synthesis of observational studies should consider credibility ceilings.
Salanti G; Ioannidis JP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 62(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 19131013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Practice of systematic reviews. VI. Searching, selection and methodological evaluation of etiological research].
van der Windt DA; Zeegers MP; Kemper HC; Assendelft WJ; Scholten RJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(25):1210-4. PubMed ID: 10897300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic differences in treatment effect estimates between propensity score methods and logistic regression.
Martens EP; Pestman WR; de Boer A; Belitser SV; Klungel OH
Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1142-7. PubMed ID: 18453634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
Ioannidis JP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic reviews of workplace injury interventions: what are we missing?
Lipscomb HJ; Pompeii LA; Myers DJ; Schoenfisch AL; Dement JM
Med Lav; 2009; 100(4):247-57. PubMed ID: 19764180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Schlesselman JJ; Collins JA
Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 12806564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of meta-synthesis in cardiovascular nursing research.
Woodend AK
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2007; 17(3):32-6. PubMed ID: 17941567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpretation of observational studies.
Jepsen P; Johnsen SP; Gillman MW; Sørensen HT
Heart; 2004 Aug; 90(8):956-60. PubMed ID: 15253985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A simple method to correct for the design effect in systematic reviews of trials using paired dichotomous data.
Perera R; Glasziou P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):975-8. PubMed ID: 17689815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Invited review: Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology.
St-Pierre NR
J Dairy Sci; 2001 Apr; 84(4):741-55. PubMed ID: 11352149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews.
Bender R; Bunce C; Clarke M; Gates S; Lange S; Pace NL; Thorlund K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 18687287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
