These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10923572)
1. The technical performance and clinical feasibility of telecolposcopy. Harper DM; Moncur MM; Harper WH; Burke GC; Rasmussen CA; Mumford MC J Fam Pract; 2000 Jul; 49(7):623-7. PubMed ID: 10923572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficacy of telecolposcopy compared with traditional colposcopy. Ferris DG; Macfee MS; Miller JA; Litaker MS; Crawley D; Watson D Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 11814505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The suitability of digital colposcopy for telematic applications]. Schädell D; Coumbos A; Ey S; Willrodt RG; Kühn W; Albrecht H Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Jun; 49(6):157-62. PubMed ID: 15279465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of digitized cervical images. Jeronimo J; Massad LS; Castle PE; Wacholder S; Schiffman M; Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):833-40. PubMed ID: 17906017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a digital store-and-forward colposcopic system--a pilot study to assess usability for telemedicine. Schädel D; Coumbos A; Ey S; Willrodt RG; Albrecht H; Kühn W J Telemed Telecare; 2005; 11(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15829055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopic proficiency-disease spectrum in a single family practice colposcopists' clinic. Brotzman GL; Schellhase KG WMJ; 2004; 103(7):61-5. PubMed ID: 15696836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What is the least costly strategy to evaluate cervical abnormalities in rural women? Comparing telemedicine, local practitioners, and expert physicians. Bishai DM; Ferris DG; Litaker MS Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 14672106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of components of colposcopic grading. Massad LS; Jeronimo J; Schiffman M; Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1279-84. PubMed ID: 18515509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An online quality assurance program for colposcopy in a population-based cervical screening setting in Italy: results on colposcopic impression. Cristiani P; Costa S; Schincaglia P; Garutti P; de Bianchi PS; Naldoni C; Sideri M; Bucchi L J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2014 Oct; 18(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 24886869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1. Jordan J; Arbyn M; Martin-Hirsch P; Schenck U; Baldauf JJ; Da Silva D; Anttila A; Nieminen P; Prendiville W Cytopathology; 2008 Dec; 19(6):342-54. PubMed ID: 19040546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of a Telecolposcopy Program in Rural Settings. Hitt WC; Low GM; Lynch CE; Gauss CH; Magann EF; Lowery CL; Eswaran H Telemed J E Health; 2016 Oct; 22(10):816-820. PubMed ID: 27128600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial. Ferris DG; Litaker M; J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 15870519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observer variability in the scoring of colpophotographs. Sellors JW; Nieminen P; Vesterinen E; Paavonen J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):1006-8. PubMed ID: 2234707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Qualitative assessment of telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy. Ferris DG; Litaker MS; Miller JA; Macfee MS; Crawley D; Watson D J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2002 Jul; 6(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 17051013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women. Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The colposcopic examination. Frank JE J Midwifery Womens Health; 2008; 53(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 18761298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interpretation of colposcopy in population-based cervical screening services in north-eastern Italy: an online interregional agreement study. Garutti P; Cristiani P; Fantin GP; Sopracordevole F; Costa S; Schincaglia P; Ravaioli A; Sassoli de Bianchi P; Naldoni C; Ferretti S; Bucchi L Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():64-69. PubMed ID: 27639133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of follow-up for low-grade cytological abnormalities in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2000-2005. Benard VB; Howe W; Saraiya M; Helsel W; Lawson HW J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Oct; 12(4):300-6. PubMed ID: 18820545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Telecolposcopy - a feasibility study in primary care. Etherington IJ J Telemed Telecare; 2002; 8 Suppl 2():22-4. PubMed ID: 12217121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]