52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10923572)
1. The technical performance and clinical feasibility of telecolposcopy.
Harper DM; Moncur MM; Harper WH; Burke GC; Rasmussen CA; Mumford MC
J Fam Pract; 2000 Jul; 49(7):623-7. PubMed ID: 10923572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficacy of telecolposcopy compared with traditional colposcopy.
Ferris DG; Macfee MS; Miller JA; Litaker MS; Crawley D; Watson D
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 11814505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The suitability of digital colposcopy for telematic applications].
Schädell D; Coumbos A; Ey S; Willrodt RG; Kühn W; Albrecht H
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Jun; 49(6):157-62. PubMed ID: 15279465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of digitized cervical images.
Jeronimo J; Massad LS; Castle PE; Wacholder S; Schiffman M;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):833-40. PubMed ID: 17906017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a digital store-and-forward colposcopic system--a pilot study to assess usability for telemedicine.
Schädel D; Coumbos A; Ey S; Willrodt RG; Albrecht H; Kühn W
J Telemed Telecare; 2005; 11(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15829055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopic proficiency-disease spectrum in a single family practice colposcopists' clinic.
Brotzman GL; Schellhase KG
WMJ; 2004; 103(7):61-5. PubMed ID: 15696836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What is the least costly strategy to evaluate cervical abnormalities in rural women? Comparing telemedicine, local practitioners, and expert physicians.
Bishai DM; Ferris DG; Litaker MS
Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 14672106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of components of colposcopic grading.
Massad LS; Jeronimo J; Schiffman M;
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1279-84. PubMed ID: 18515509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An online quality assurance program for colposcopy in a population-based cervical screening setting in Italy: results on colposcopic impression.
Cristiani P; Costa S; Schincaglia P; Garutti P; de Bianchi PS; Naldoni C; Sideri M; Bucchi L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2014 Oct; 18(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 24886869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1.
Jordan J; Arbyn M; Martin-Hirsch P; Schenck U; Baldauf JJ; Da Silva D; Anttila A; Nieminen P; Prendiville W
Cytopathology; 2008 Dec; 19(6):342-54. PubMed ID: 19040546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of a Telecolposcopy Program in Rural Settings.
Hitt WC; Low GM; Lynch CE; Gauss CH; Magann EF; Lowery CL; Eswaran H
Telemed J E Health; 2016 Oct; 22(10):816-820. PubMed ID: 27128600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial.
Ferris DG; Litaker M;
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 15870519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observer variability in the scoring of colpophotographs.
Sellors JW; Nieminen P; Vesterinen E; Paavonen J
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):1006-8. PubMed ID: 2234707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Qualitative assessment of telemedicine network and computer-based telecolposcopy.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS; Miller JA; Macfee MS; Crawley D; Watson D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2002 Jul; 6(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 17051013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women.
Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The colposcopic examination.
Frank JE
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2008; 53(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 18761298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Telemedicine network telecolposcopy compared with computer-based telecolposcopy.
Ferris DG; Bishai DM; Litaker MS; Dickman ED; Miller JA; Macfee MS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2004 Apr; 8(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 15874845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interpretation of colposcopy in population-based cervical screening services in north-eastern Italy: an online interregional agreement study.
Garutti P; Cristiani P; Fantin GP; Sopracordevole F; Costa S; Schincaglia P; Ravaioli A; Sassoli de Bianchi P; Naldoni C; Ferretti S; Bucchi L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():64-69. PubMed ID: 27639133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of follow-up for low-grade cytological abnormalities in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2000-2005.
Benard VB; Howe W; Saraiya M; Helsel W; Lawson HW
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Oct; 12(4):300-6. PubMed ID: 18820545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Telecolposcopy - a feasibility study in primary care.
Etherington IJ
J Telemed Telecare; 2002; 8 Suppl 2():22-4. PubMed ID: 12217121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
