These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10924028)

  • 1. Decisions about access to health care and accountability for reasonableness.
    Daniels N
    J Urban Health; 1999 Jun; 76(2):176-91. PubMed ID: 10924028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communication of bed allocation decisions in a critical care unit and accountability for reasonableness.
    Cooper AB; Joglekar AS; Gibson J; Swota AH; Martin DK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2005 Oct; 5():67. PubMed ID: 16259634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Justice and procedure: how does "accountability for reasonableness" result in fair limit-setting decisions?
    Rid A
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jan; 35(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 19103936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process.
    Schlander M
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jul; 34(7):534-9. PubMed ID: 18591289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ethics of accountability in managed care reform.
    Daniels N; Sabin J
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1998; 17(5):50-64. PubMed ID: 9769571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?
    Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):766-73. PubMed ID: 19070414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers.
    Martin DK; Giacomini M; Singer PA
    Health Policy; 2002 Sep; 61(3):279-90. PubMed ID: 12098521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Priority setting and cardiac surgery: a qualitative case study.
    Walton NA; Martin DK; Peter EH; Pringle DM; Singer PA
    Health Policy; 2007 Mar; 80(3):444-58. PubMed ID: 16757057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework.
    Maluka S; Kamuzora P; San Sebastiån M; Byskov J; Olsen ØE; Shayo E; Ndawi B; Hurtig AK
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Aug; 71(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 20554365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Weighing the evidence: trends in managed care formulary decision making.
    de Lissovoy G
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2003; 64 Suppl 17():29-32. PubMed ID: 14680425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New standards for medical review organizations: holding them and health plans accountable for their decisions.
    Rodwin MA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Mar; 30(3):519-24. PubMed ID: 21383371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Making accountability key in health care. Interview by Patrick Mullen.
    Millenson ML
    Manag Care; 1999 Dec; 8(12):36, 38-40, 43-4. PubMed ID: 11185278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Priority setting in hospitals: fairness, inclusiveness, and the problem of institutional power differences.
    Gibson JL; Martin DK; Singer PA
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 61(11):2355-62. PubMed ID: 15950347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Centralized drug review processes: are they fair?
    Mitton CR; McMahon M; Morgan S; Gibson J
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jul; 63(1):200-11. PubMed ID: 16427728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of technology assessment in health benefits coverage for medical devices.
    Braslow NM; Shatin D; McCarthy DB; Newcomer LN
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP139-50. PubMed ID: 10185990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond accountability for reasonableness.
    Friedman A
    Bioethics; 2008 Feb; 22(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 18251770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conceptualizations of fairness and legitimacy in the context of Ethiopian health priority setting: Reflections on the applicability of accountability for reasonableness.
    Petricca K; Bekele A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Dec; 18(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 28544136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy.
    Daniels N; Porteny T; Urritia J
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2015 Nov; 5(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 26673643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?
    Reeleder D; Martin DK; Keresztes C; Singer PA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2005 Jan; 5(1):8. PubMed ID: 15663792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SARS and hospital priority setting: a qualitative case study and evaluation.
    Bell JA; Hyland S; DePellegrin T; Upshur RE; Bernstein M; Martin DK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 4(1):36. PubMed ID: 15606924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.