These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10924208)

  • 1. Decision time and prey gregariousness influence attack probability in naïve and experienced predators.
    Gamberale-Stille G
    Anim Behav; 2000 Jul; 60(1):95-99. PubMed ID: 10924208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey.
    Gamberale G; Tullberg BS
    Proc Biol Sci; 1996 Oct; 263(1375):1329-34. PubMed ID: 8914330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.
    Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):357-61. PubMed ID: 11270431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Did aggregation favour the initial evolution of warning coloration? A novel world revisited.
    Tullberg BS; Leimar O; Stille GG
    Anim Behav; 2000 Feb; 59(2):281-287. PubMed ID: 10675250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social learning within and across predator species reduces attacks on novel aposematic prey.
    Hämäläinen L; Mappes J; Rowland HM; Teichmann M; Thorogood R
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 May; 89(5):1153-1164. PubMed ID: 32077104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):751-63. PubMed ID: 10937250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.
    Stuart YE; Dappen N; Losin N
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e48497. PubMed ID: 23119039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of social learning on avoidance of aposematic prey in juvenile great tits (Parus major).
    Landová E; Hotová Svádová K; Fuchs R; Štys P; Exnerová A
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Sep; 20(5):855-866. PubMed ID: 28639012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strong antiapostatic selection against novel rare aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul; 98(16):9181-4. PubMed ID: 11459937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The signal detection problem of aposematic prey revisited: integrating prior social and personal experience.
    Hämäläinen L; Thorogood R
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Jul; 375(1802):20190473. PubMed ID: 32420858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.
    Riipi M; Alatalo RV; Lindström L; Mappes J
    Nature; 2001 Oct; 413(6855):512-4. PubMed ID: 11586357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Higher survival of an aposematic than of a cryptic form of a distasteful bug.
    Sillén-Tullberg B
    Oecologia; 1985 Oct; 67(3):411-415. PubMed ID: 28311576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aversive Learning in the Praying Mantis (
    Carle T; Horiwaki R; Hurlbert A; Yamawaki Y
    J Insect Behav; 2018; 31(2):158-175. PubMed ID: 29628622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness.
    Merilaita S; Ruxton GD
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Mar; 245(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 17157321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automimicry destabilizes aposematism: predator sample-and-reject behaviour may provide a solution.
    Gamberale-Stille G; Guilford T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Dec; 271(1557):2621-5. PubMed ID: 15615689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.
    Puurtinen M; Kaitala V
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predators' decisions to eat defended prey depend on the size of undefended prey.
    Halpin CG; Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Anim Behav; 2013 Jun; 85(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 23814280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predators' toxin burdens influence their strategic decisions to eat toxic prey.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Curr Biol; 2007 Sep; 17(17):1479-83. PubMed ID: 17716896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pyrazine odour makes visually conspicuous prey aversive.
    Lindström L; Rowe C; Guilford T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jan; 268(1463):159-62. PubMed ID: 11209885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.