These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10924212)

  • 1. Individual differences in the use of social information in foraging by captive great tits.
    Marchetti C; Drent PJ
    Anim Behav; 2000 Jul; 60(1):131-140. PubMed ID: 10924212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To graze or gorge: consistency and flexibility of individual foraging tactics in tits.
    Milligan ND; Radersma R; Cole EF; Sheldon BC
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Jul; 86(4):826-836. PubMed ID: 28191628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Worms under cover: relationships between performance in learning tasks and personality in great tits (Parus major).
    Amy M; van Oers K; Naguib M
    Anim Cogn; 2012 Sep; 15(5):763-70. PubMed ID: 22532072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game.
    Reichert MS; Morand-Ferron J; Kulahci IG; Firth JA; Davidson GL; Crofts SJ; Quinn JL
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Nov; 90(11):2497-2509. PubMed ID: 34091901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sight of a predator can stimulate a corticosterone response in the great tit (Parus major).
    Cockrem JF; Silverin B
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2002 Feb; 125(2):248-55. PubMed ID: 11884070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of memory and the hippocampus: comparison of food-storing and nonstoring birds on a one-trial associative memory task.
    Clayton NS
    J Neurosci; 1995 Apr; 15(4):2796-807. PubMed ID: 7722629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Personality-dependent differences in problem-solving performance in a social context reflect foraging strategies.
    Zandberg L; Quinn JL; Naguib M; van Oers K
    Behav Processes; 2017 Jan; 134():95-102. PubMed ID: 27667554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inhibitory control, exploration behaviour and manipulated ecological context are associated with foraging flexibility in the great tit.
    Coomes JR; Davidson GL; Reichert MS; Kulahci IG; Troisi CA; Quinn JL
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Feb; 91(2):320-333. PubMed ID: 34693529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personality matters: individual variation in reactions of naive bird predators to aposematic prey.
    Exnerová A; Svádová KH; Fucíková E; Drent P; Stys P
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Mar; 277(1682):723-8. PubMed ID: 19889698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To eat and not be eaten: diurnal mass gain and foraging strategies in wintering great tits.
    Moiron M; Mathot KJ; Dingemanse NJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Mar; 285(1874):. PubMed ID: 29540518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gender and Personality Differences in Response to Social Stressors in Great Tits (Parus major).
    van der Meer E; van Oers K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127984. PubMed ID: 26011633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diurnal variation in the production of vocal information about food supports a model of social adjustment in wild songbirds.
    Hillemann F; Cole EF; Keen SC; Sheldon BC; Farine DR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 286(1897):20182740. PubMed ID: 30963842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does the sex and age of birds and the size of human settlements affect recapturing of the Great Tit (Parus major) at bird feeders?
    Golawski A; Polakowski M; Filimowski P; Stępniewski K; Stępniewska K; Kiljan G; Kilon D; Pietkiewicz M; Sztwiertnia H; Cichocka A; Kosicki JZ
    Behav Processes; 2019 May; 162():162-166. PubMed ID: 30885678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Colour preferences of UK garden birds at supplementary seed feeders.
    Rothery L; Scott GW; Morrell LJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172422. PubMed ID: 28212435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the exploratory behaviour on a bird's ability to categorize a predator.
    Nácarová J; Veselý P; Fuchs R
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jun; 151():89-95. PubMed ID: 29581025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can video playback provide social information for foraging blue tits?
    Hämäläinen L; Rowland HM; Mappes J; Thorogood R
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3062. PubMed ID: 28344901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stable producer-scrounger dynamics in wild birds: sociability and learning speed covary with scrounging behaviour.
    Aplin LM; Morand-Ferron J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Apr; 284(1852):. PubMed ID: 28404775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Personality predicts spatial responses to food manipulations in free-ranging great tits (Parus major).
    van Overveld T; Matthysen E
    Biol Lett; 2010 Apr; 6(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 19906682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental evidence that group foragers can converge on predicted producer-scrounger equilibria.
    Mottley K; Giraldeau LA
    Anim Behav; 2000 Sep; 60(3):341-350. PubMed ID: 11007643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex.
    Rubene D; Low M; Brodin A
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Feb; 10(2):221336. PubMed ID: 36778952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.