524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10924579)
1. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Elgersma OE; Wüst AF; Buijs PC; van Der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading.
Anzalone N; Scomazzoni F; Castellano R; Strada L; Righi C; Politi LS; Kirchin MA; Chiesa R; Scotti G
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maximum internal carotid arterial stenosis: assessment with rotational angiography versus conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
Elgersma OE; Buijs PC; Wüst AF; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):777-83. PubMed ID: 10580953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; Mali WP
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 12869686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography--preliminary study.
Remonda L; Heid O; Schroth G
Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 9769818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography.
Willig DS; Turski PA; Frayne R; Graves VB; Korosec FR; Swan JS; Mistretta CA; Grist TM
Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):447-51. PubMed ID: 9680574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Internal carotid artery stenosis measurement: comparison of 3D computed rotational angiography and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Hyde DE; Fox AJ; Gulka I; Kalapos P; Lee DH; Pelz DM; Holdsworth DW
Stroke; 2004 Dec; 35(12):2776-81. PubMed ID: 15514196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of gadofosveset-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography for lower-extremity peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
Grijalba FU; Esandi MC
Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 20105092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maximum stenosis of extracranial internal carotid artery: effect of luminal morphology on stenosis measurement by using CT angiography and conventional DSA.
Hirai T; Korogi Y; Ono K; Murata Y; Takahashi M; Suginohara K; Uemura S
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):802-9. PubMed ID: 11719682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extracranial atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: evaluation of non-breath-hold three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.
Slosman F; Stolpen AH; Lexa FJ; Schnall MD; Langlotz CP; Carpenter JP; Goldberg HI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Feb; 170(2):489-95. PubMed ID: 9456971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis from source MR angiograms.
Anderson CM; Lee RE; Levin DL; de la Torre Alonso S; Saloner D
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 8090894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts.
Froger CL; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Douwes-Draaijer P; Cuypers PW; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):284-91. PubMed ID: 15618386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical potentialities and limitations of two- and three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis].
Nöldeke HA; Friedrich JM; Wallner B; Weidenmaier W
Rofo; 1992 Dec; 157(6):566-72. PubMed ID: 1457793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR angiography of internal carotid arteries: breath-hold Gd-enhanced 3D fast imaging with steady-state precession versus unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight techniques.
Sardanelli F; Zandrino F; Parodi RC; De Caro G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999; 23(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 10096327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
