These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10925772)

  • 1. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
    García-Godoy F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentin/enamel adhesives in pediatric dentistry.
    García-Godoy F; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):462-4. PubMed ID: 12412961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM GICs) implications for use in pediatric dentistry.
    Vaikuntam J
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 9189004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternatives to silver amalgam and resin composite in pediatric dentistry.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):697-703. PubMed ID: 10200719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentin-enamel adhesives in pediatric dentistry: an update.
    García-Godoy F; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 25905654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Restoring primary anterior teeth.
    Waggoner WF
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):511-6. PubMed ID: 12412967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conservative interproximal box-only polyacid modified composite restorations in primary molars, twelve-month clinical results.
    Marks LA; van Amerongen WE; Kreulen CM; Weerheijm KL; Martens LC
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(1):23-9, 12. PubMed ID: 10360200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Materials used to restore class II lesions in primary molars: a survey of California pediatric dentists.
    Pair RL; Udin RD; Tanbonliong T
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 15646912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.
    Varpio M
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ketac Molar Versus Dyract Class II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical results.
    Marks LA; van Amerongen WE; Borgmeijer PJ; Groen HJ; Martens LC
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(1):37-41, 8-9. PubMed ID: 10736656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials.
    Attar N; Onen A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11990054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Restoration materials for primary molars-results from a European survey.
    Buerkle V; Kuehnisch J; Guelmann M; Hickel R
    J Dent; 2005 Apr; 33(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 15781135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.