These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10925988)

  • 1. Cost-utility of one-time colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer at various ages.
    Ness RM; Holmes AM; Klein R; Dittus R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Jul; 95(7):1800-11. PubMed ID: 10925988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?
    Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Bauerfeind P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Aug; 94(8):2268-74. PubMed ID: 10445561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of capsule endoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Hassan C; Zullo A; Winn S; Morini S
    Endoscopy; 2008 May; 40(5):414-21. PubMed ID: 18302080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
    Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A decision-analytic evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of family history-based colorectal cancer screening programs.
    Ramsey SD; Wilschut J; Boer R; van Ballegooijen M
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 105(8):1861-9. PubMed ID: 20461066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening based on risk for colorectal cancer is the most cost-effective approach.
    Dan YY; Chuah BY; Koh DC; Yeoh KG
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Mar; 10(3):266-71.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22100624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simulation model for colorectal cancer screening: potential of stool tests with various performance characteristics compared with screening colonoscopy.
    Haug U; Brenner H
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):422-8. PubMed ID: 15734968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colorectal cancer screening in evolution: Japan and the USA.
    Ross WA
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 May; 25 Suppl 1():S49-56. PubMed ID: 20586866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a low-intensity patient-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening.
    Shankaran V; McKoy JM; Dandade N; Nonzee N; Tigue CA; Bennett CL; Denberg TD
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Nov; 25(33):5248-53. PubMed ID: 18024871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colonoscopy screening in the elderly: when to stop?
    Stevens T; Burke CA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Aug; 98(8):1881-5. PubMed ID: 12907348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.
    Hassan C; Zullo A; Laghi A; Reitano I; Taggi F; Cerro P; Iafrate F; Giustini M; Winn S; Morini S
    Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 17112797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of computerized tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.
    Heitman SJ; Manns BJ; Hilsden RJ; Fong A; Dean S; Romagnuolo J
    CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):877-81. PubMed ID: 16217110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Family history and age at initiation of colorectal cancer screening.
    Brenner H; Hoffmeister M; Haug U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Sep; 103(9):2326-31. PubMed ID: 18702651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Taishotoyama Symposium Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: economics, capacity and adherence.
    Inadomi JM
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Dec; 23 Suppl 2():S198-204. PubMed ID: 19120898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening strategies in Singapore: a dynamic decision analytic approach.
    Wong SS; Leong AP; Leong TY
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):104-10. PubMed ID: 15360784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Projected dynamics of colonoscopic screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer.
    Gheorghe C; Iacob R; Gheorghe L; Cotruta B; Bancila I; Iacob S; Bucur D; Voinea D; Popescu I
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(86-87):1568-72. PubMed ID: 19102344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer with low-dose aspirin in combination with endoscopy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Hassan C; Rex DK; Cooper GS; Zullo A; Launois R; Benamouzig R
    Gut; 2012 Aug; 61(8):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21997545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost effectiveness of colonoscopy, based on the appropriateness of an indication.
    Hassan C; Di Giulio E; Pickhardt PJ; Zullo A; Laghi A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Nov; 6(11):1231-6. PubMed ID: 18995214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients.
    Ko CW; Sonnenberg A
    Gastroenterology; 2005 Oct; 129(4):1163-70. PubMed ID: 16230070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A literature review of assumptions on test characteristics and adherence in economic evaluations of colonoscopy and CT-colonography screening.
    van Gils P; van den Berg M; van Kranen H; de Wit AG
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jun; 45(9):1554-9. PubMed ID: 19261464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.