149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10926433)
1. A comparative clinical trial of a compomer and a resin adhesive for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; McCluskey LA; McAuley F; Creanor SL; Newell J; Love J
Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 10926433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial.
Mavropoulos A; Karamouzos A; Kolokithas G; Athanasiou AE
J Orthod; 2003 Jun; 30(2):139-47; discussion 127-8. PubMed ID: 12835430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fluoride release and cariostatic ability of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement used for orthodontic bonding.
Chung CK; Millett DT; Creanor SL; Gilmour WH; Foye RH
J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):533-8. PubMed ID: 9699448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a light-cured resin adhesive.
Millett DT; Hallgren A; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; Robertson M; Love J
Angle Orthod; 1998 Aug; 68(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 9709836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
Wilson RM; Donly KJ
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An 18-month clinical study of bond failures with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in orthodontic practice.
Hitmi L; Muller C; Mujajic M; Attal JP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):406-15. PubMed ID: 11606966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Six-month bracket failure rate evaluation of a self-etching primer.
Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Turk T; Cakmak F
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 18216373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of nonrinse conditioning solution and a compomer as an alternative method of bonding orthodontic bracket.
Bishara SE; Laffoon JF; VonWald L; Warren JJ
Angle Orthod; 2001 Dec; 71(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 11771784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decalcification in relation to brackets bonded with glass ionomer cement or a resin adhesive.
Millett DT; Nunn JH; Welbury RR; Gordon PH
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 10022187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Compomers--a new bracket bonding generation in orthodontics?
Eberhard H; Hirschfelder U; Sindel J
J Orofac Orthop; 1997 Feb; 58(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 9300839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.
Haydar B; Sarikaya S; Cehreli ZC
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10515144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer retained orthodontic appliances. An in vivo study.
Twetman S; McWilliam JS; Hallgren A; Oliveby A
Swed Dent J; 1997; 21(5):169-75. PubMed ID: 9472145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bonded molar tubes--an in vitro evaluation.
Millett DT; Letters S; Roger E; Cummings A; Love J
Angle Orthod; 2001 Oct; 71(5):380-5. PubMed ID: 11605872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomised clinical trial to investigate bond failure rates using a self-etching primer.
Murfitt PG; Quick AN; Swain MV; Herbison GP
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Oct; 28(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 16763088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of sealant and self-etching primer on enamel decalcification. Part II: an in-vivo study.
Ghiz MA; Ngan P; Kao E; Martin C; Gunel E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 19201328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of bond strength between orthodontic brackets bonded with halogen and plasma arc curing lights: an in-vitro and in-vivo study.
Signorelli MD; Kao E; Ngan PW; Gladwin MA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 16473722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bond strength of 4 orthodontic adhesives used with a caries-protective resin sealant.
Lowder PD; Foley T; Banting DW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 18675212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
