118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10926892)
21. Comparison of friedewald formula and modified friedewald formula with direct homogeneous assay for low density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation.
Anwar M; Khan DA; Khan FA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Jan; 24(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 24411534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Differential reactivity of two homogeneous LDL-cholesterol methods to LDL and VLDL subfractions, as demonstrated by ultracentrifugation and HPLC.
Usui S; Kakuuchi H; Okamoto M; Mizukami Y; Okazaki M
Clin Chem; 2002 Nov; 48(11):1946-54. PubMed ID: 12406980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validating the NIH LDL-C equation in a specialized lipid cohort: Does it add up?
Higgins V; Leiter LA; Delaney SR; Beriault DR
Clin Biochem; 2022 Jan; 99():60-68. PubMed ID: 34656564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Friedewald formula underestimates LDL cholesterol at low concentrations.
Scharnagl H; Nauck M; Wieland H; März W
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 May; 39(5):426-31. PubMed ID: 11434393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of apolipoprotein E genotype on the reliability of the Friedewald formula in the estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations.
Tremblay AJ; Bergeron J; Gagné JM; Gagné C; Couture P
Metabolism; 2005 Aug; 54(8):1014-9. PubMed ID: 16092050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation and clinical application of a direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol assay in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic adults.
Yu HH; Ginsburg GS; Harris N; Rifai N
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(10):1295-9. PubMed ID: 9388101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multicentric evaluation of the homogeneous LDL-cholesterol Plus assay: comparison with beta-quantification and Friedewald formula.
Esteban-Salan M; Aguilar-Doreste JA; Arranz-Pena ML; Juve-Cuxart S; Gich-Salarich I; Zapico-Muniz E; Ordonez-Llanos J
Clin Biochem; 2008 Nov; 41(16-17):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18722364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Measurement of plasma LDL cholesterol in patients with diabetes.
Whiting MJ; Shephard MD; Tallis GA
Diabetes Care; 1997 Jan; 20(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 9028686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Application of a modified precipitation method for the measurement of small dense LDL-cholesterol (sd-LDL-C) in a population in southern Brazil.
Cavalcante Lda S; da Silva EL
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2012 Mar; 50(9):1649-56. PubMed ID: 22962227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Differences in Measured Values among Homogenous Assay Reagents of LDL-C in LP-X Positive Serum Samples].
Abe M; Kurosawa H; Sato R; Ito K; Tomono Y; Manita D; Hirowatari Y; Yoshida H
Rinsho Byori; 2015 Mar; 63(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 26524853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation of the Friedewald formula for the estimation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in a sub-Saharan African population.
Choukem SP; Manases T; Nda-Mefoo JP; Dimala CA; Mboue-Djieka Y; Sobngwi E; Kengne AP
Clin Biochem; 2018 Mar; 53():25-30. PubMed ID: 29273329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A more valid measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in diabetic patients.
Hirany S; Li D; Jialal I
Am J Med; 1997 Jan; 102(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 9209200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of a new method for the direct and simultaneous assessment of LDL- and HDL-cholesterol with ultracentrifugation and established methods.
Benlian P; Cansier C; Hennache G; Khallouf O; Bayer P; Duron F; Carrat F; Couderc R; Chazouillères O; Bardet J; Bouchard P; Poupon R; Masliah J; Béréziat G
Clin Chem; 2000 Apr; 46(4):493-505. PubMed ID: 10759473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reactions of direct LDL-cholesterol assays with pure LDL fraction and IDL: comparison of three homogeneous methods.
Sakaue T; Hirano T; Yoshino G; Sakai K; Takeuchi H; Adachi M
Clin Chim Acta; 2000 May; 295(1-2):97-106. PubMed ID: 10767397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by the Friedewald equation is adequate for classifying patients on the basis of nationally recommended cutpoints.
Warnick GR; Knopp RH; Fitzpatrick V; Branson L
Clin Chem; 1990 Jan; 36(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2297909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of alternative calculation methods for determining LDL cholesterol.
Vohnout B; Vachulová A; Blazícek P; Dukát A; Fodor G; Lietava J
Vnitr Lek; 2008 Oct; 54(10):961-4. PubMed ID: 19009762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Immunoseparation method for measuring low-density lipoprotein cholesterol directly from serum evaluated.
McNamara JR; Cole TG; Contois JH; Ferguson CA; Ordovas JM; Schaefer EJ
Clin Chem; 1995 Feb; 41(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 7874777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Direct method for the measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in patients with chronic renal disease: a comparative assessment.
Akanji AO
Nephron; 1998; 79(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 9647494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of LDL-cholesterol direct measurement with the estimate using the Friedewald formula in a sample of 10,664 patients.
Cordova CM; Schneider CR; Juttel ID; Cordova MM
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 83(6):482-7; 476-81. PubMed ID: 15654445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of calculated and direct low density lipoprotein cholesterol determinations in a routine laboratory.
Amayo AA; Kirera S
East Afr Med J; 2004 Mar; 81(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 15293974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
