802 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10928175)
1. Comparison and discrepancy of 18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and Tc-99m MDP bone scan to detect bone metastases.
Kao CH; Hsieh JF; Tsai SC; Ho YJ; Yen RF
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):2189-92. PubMed ID: 10928175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing whole body 18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methylene diophosphate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Hsia TC; Shen YY; Yen RF; Kao CH; Changlai SP
Neoplasma; 2002; 49(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 12382027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing whole body (18)F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Yang SN; Liang JA; Lin FJ; Kao CH; Lin CC; Lee CC
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2002 Jun; 128(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 12073051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing whole body 18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methylene diphosphate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with renal cell carcinomas - a preliminary report.
Wu HC; Yen RF; Shen YY; Kao CH; Lin CC; Lee CC
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2002 Sep; 128(9):503-6. PubMed ID: 12242515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discordant findings in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: absolutely normal bone scans versus disseminated bone metastases on positron-emission tomography/computed tomography.
Ak I; Sivrikoz MC; Entok E; Vardareli E
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Apr; 37(4):792-6. PubMed ID: 20015657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of diagnostic ability between (99m)Tc-MDP bone scan and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for bone metastasis in patients with small cell lung cancer.
Lee JW; Lee SM; Lee HS; Kim YH; Bae WK
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 26(8):627-33. PubMed ID: 22729551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the diagnostic and prognostic values of 99mTc-MDP-planar bone scintigraphy, 131I-SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer.
Qiu ZL; Xue YL; Song HJ; Luo QY
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Dec; 33(12):1232-42. PubMed ID: 23111353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metabolic activity in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer were similar as studied by
Pietrzak A; Czepczynski R; Wierzchoslawska E; Cholewinski W
Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(3):237-240. PubMed ID: 29177262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What Is the Comparative Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MDP Skeletal Scintigraphy, and Whole-body MRI as a Staging Investigation to Detect Skeletal Metastases in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma?
Aryal A; Kumar VS; Shamim SA; Gamanagatti S; Khan SA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 479(8):1768-1779. PubMed ID: 33635285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is (99m)Tc-MDP whole body bone scintigraphy adjuvant to (18)F-FDG-PET for the detection of skeletal metastases?
Sahin E; Zincirkeser S; Akcan AB; Elboga U
J BUON; 2014; 19(1):291-6. PubMed ID: 24659678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT with (99m)Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in cancer patients.
Ozülker T; Küçüköz Uzun A; Ozülker F; Ozpaçac T
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jun; 31(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 20224457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 99 m-Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of skeletal metastases.
Chang CY; Gill CM; Joseph Simeone F; Taneja AK; Huang AJ; Torriani M; Bredella MA
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 25533313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and (99m)Tc-MDP whole-body bone scanning for imaging osteolytic bone metastases.
Zhang L; Chen L; Xie Q; Zhang Y; Cheng L; Li H; Wang J
BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Mar; 15():7. PubMed ID: 25885599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastasis in head and neck tumors.
Al-Bulushi NK; Abouzied ME
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Jun; 37(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 26813992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of 18F-fluoride PET-CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast, lung and prostate carcinoma: a comparison with FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan.
Damle NA; Bal C; Bandopadhyaya GP; Kumar L; Kumar P; Malhotra A; Lata S
Jpn J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 31(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23377765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of occult bone metastases of lung cancer with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Foo SS; Ramdave S; Berlangieri SU; Scott AM
Australas Radiol; 2004 Jun; 48(2):214-6. PubMed ID: 15230758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the PET/CT era: Do we still need the bone scan?
Caglar M; Kupik O; Karabulut E; Høilund-Carlsen PF
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2016; 35(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26514321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significance of hormone receptor status in comparison of 18F -FDG-PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for evaluating bone metastases in patients with breast cancer: single center experience.
Teke F; Teke M; Inal A; Kaplan MA; Kucukoner M; Aksu R; Urakci Z; Tasdemir B; Isikdogan A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(1):387-91. PubMed ID: 25640386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer.
Hahn S; Heusner T; Kümmel S; Köninger A; Nagarajah J; Müller S; Boy C; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Stahl A
Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):1009-14. PubMed ID: 21969709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
