396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10928227)
1. In situ femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry related to ash weight, bone size and density, and its relationship with mechanical failure loads of the proximal femur.
Lochmüller EM; Miller P; Bürklein D; Wehr U; Rambeck W; Eckstein F
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 10928227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of vertebral failure loads from spinal and femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and calcaneal ultrasound: an in situ analysis with intact soft tissues.
Lochmüller EM; Eckstein F; Kaiser D; Zeller JB; Landgraf J; Putz R; Steldinger R
Bone; 1998 Nov; 23(5):417-24. PubMed ID: 9823447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of femoral and lumbar DXA and calcaneal ultrasound, measured in situ with intact soft tissues, with the in vitro failure loads of the proximal femur.
Lochmüller EM; Zeller JB; Kaiser D; Eckstein F; Landgraf J; Putz R; Steldinger R
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 10326066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structural analysis of trabecular bone of the proximal femur using multislice computed tomography: a comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry for predicting biomechanical strength in vitro.
Bauer JS; Kohlmann S; Eckstein F; Mueller D; Lochmüller EM; Link TM
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Feb; 78(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 16467973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DXA predictions of human femoral mechanical properties depend on the load configuration.
Dall'Ara E; Luisier B; Schmidt R; Pretterklieber M; Kainberger F; Zysset P; Pahr D
Med Eng Phys; 2013 Nov; 35(11):1564-72; discussion 1564. PubMed ID: 23684578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The contribution of cortical and cancellous bone to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in the female proximal femur.
Lundeen GA; Knecht SL; Vajda EG; Bloebaum RD; Hofmann AA
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 11315237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone mass, areal, and volumetric bone density are equally accurate, sensitive, and specific surrogates of the breaking strength of the vertebral body: an in vitro study.
Tabensky AD; Williams J; DeLuca V; Briganti E; Seeman E
J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Dec; 11(12):1981-8. PubMed ID: 8970902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in predicting mechanical characteristics of rat femur.
Järvinen TL; Sievänen H; Kannus P; Järvinen M
Bone; 1998 May; 22(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 9600791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proximal femur specimens: automated 3D trabecular bone mineral density analysis at multidetector CT--correlation with biomechanical strength measurement.
Huber MB; Carballido-Gamio J; Bauer JS; Baum T; Eckstein F; Lochmüller EM; Majumdar S; Link TM
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):472-81. PubMed ID: 18430879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DXA and pQCT predict pertrochanteric and not femoral neck fracture load in a human side-impact fracture model.
Gebauer M; Stark O; Vettorazzi E; Grifka J; Püschel K; Amling M; Beckmann J
J Orthop Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 24019186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of femoral neck strength by 3-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry.
Le Bras A; Kolta S; Soubrane P; Skalli W; Roux C; Mitton D
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 17097528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT).
Pottecher P; Engelke K; Duchemin L; Museyko O; Moser T; Mitton D; Vicaut E; Adams J; Skalli W; Laredo JD; Bousson V
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 27077380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of the fracture load of whole proximal femur specimens by topological analysis of the mineral distribution in DXA-scan images.
Boehm HF; Horng A; Notohamiprodjo M; Eckstein F; Burklein D; Panteleon A; Lutz J; Reiser M
Bone; 2008 Nov; 43(5):826-31. PubMed ID: 18723137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of vertebral and femoral strength in vitro by bone mineral density measured at different skeletal sites.
Cheng XG; Lowet G; Boonen S; Nicholson PH; Van der Perre G; Dequeker J
J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Sep; 13(9):1439-43. PubMed ID: 9738516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual-energy digital radiography in the assessment of bone mechanical properties.
Toljamo PS; Lammentausta E; Pulkkinen P; Tervonen O; Jämsä T; Nieminen MT
Physiol Meas; 2012 Jan; 33(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22156238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of anthropometric parameters and bone size on bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual X-ray absorptiometry at the hip.
Guglielmi G; van Kuijk C; Li J; Meta MD; Scillitani A; Lang TF
Acta Radiol; 2006 Jul; 47(6):574-80. PubMed ID: 16875335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regular physical exercise and bone mineral density: a four-year controlled randomized trial in middle-aged men. The DNASCO study.
Huuskonen J; Väisänen SB; Kröger H; Jurvelin JS; Alhava E; Rauramaa R
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(5):349-55. PubMed ID: 11444081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for predicting fracture loads of the infant femur for injury investigation: an in vitro porcine model.
Pierce MC; Valdevit A; Anderson L; Inoue N; Hauser DL
J Orthop Trauma; 2000 Nov; 14(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 11149504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total lymphocyte count and femoral bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.
Di Monaco M; Vallero F; Di Monaco R; Mautino F; Cavanna A
J Bone Miner Metab; 2004; 22(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 14691689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the measurement of bone mineral in intact and excised long bones of rats.
Nagy TR; Prince CW; Li J
J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Sep; 16(9):1682-7. PubMed ID: 11547838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
