173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10928769)
1. Influence of refraction on tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis.
Gimeno JA; Muñoz LA; Valenzuela LA; Moltó FJ; Rahhal MS
Cornea; 2000 Jul; 19(4):512-6. PubMed ID: 10928769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study.
Schallhorn JM; Schallhorn SC; Ou Y
Ophthalmology; 2015 Mar; 122(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 25444636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group.
Steinert RF; Hersh PS
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1998; 96():197-221; discussion 221-7. PubMed ID: 10360290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. A randomized prospective study.
Hersh PS; Brint SF; Maloney RK; Durrie DS; Gordon M; Michelson MA; Thompson VM; Berkeley RB; Schein OD; Steinert RF
Ophthalmology; 1998 Aug; 105(8):1512-22, discussion 1522-3. PubMed ID: 9709767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized bilateral comparison of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for 2.50 to 8.00 diopters of myopia.
El-Maghraby A; Salah T; Waring GO; Klyce S; Ibrahim O
Ophthalmology; 1999 Mar; 106(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 10080199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 200 Hz flying-spot technology of the LaserSight LSX excimer laser in the treatment of myopic astigmatism: six and 12 month outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.
Stojanovic A; Nitter TA
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 Aug; 27(8):1263-77. PubMed ID: 11524200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optical quality after myopic photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison using a double-pass system.
Ondategui JC; Vilaseca M; Arjona M; Montasell A; Cardona G; Güell JL; Pujol J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 22153091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Goldmann and modified Goldmann tonometry measuring intraocular pressure changes in eyes which underwent myopic laser in situ Keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.
Ang RET; Rixon A; Kilgore K; Schweitzer J
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):503. PubMed ID: 36539706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Initial results of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis performed by a single surgeon.
Ahn CS; Clinch TE; Moshirfar M; Weis JR; Hutchinson CB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Aug; 25(8):1048-55. PubMed ID: 10445189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery.
Aristeidou AP; Labiris G; Katsanos A; Fanariotis M; Foudoulakis NC; Kozobolis VP
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 249(5):767-73. PubMed ID: 20577756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for residual refractive error after phakic intraocular lens implantation.
Sánchez-Galeana CA; Smith RJ; Rodriguez X; Montes M; Chayet AS
J Refract Surg; 2001; 17(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 11383760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recovery of uncorrected visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia.
Walker MB; Wilson SE
Cornea; 2001 Mar; 20(2):153-5. PubMed ID: 11248818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: a control-matched study.
Pop M; Payette Y
Ophthalmology; 2000 Feb; 107(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 10690820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual outcomes after Epi-LASIK and PRK for low and moderate myopia.
Sia RK; Coe CD; Edwards JD; Ryan DS; Bower KS
J Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 28(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 21985667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of laser in situ ketatomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia using a mixed-effects model.
Mori Y; Miyata K; Ono T; Yagi Y; Kamiya K; Amano S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174810. PubMed ID: 28362808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery.
Montés-Micó R; Charman WN
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 May; 21(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 11396396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraocular Pressure Changes in Myopic Patients Undergoing Laser In-Situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy.
Humayun S; Bangash YW; Ishaq M; Shah AA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2023 Oct; 33(10):1148-1152. PubMed ID: 37804021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Myopia correction with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: One-year case-matched analysis.
Luger MH; Ewering T; Arba-Mosquera S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1579-1587. PubMed ID: 27956284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.
Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Ohmoto F
Cornea; 2009 Aug; 28(7):765-9. PubMed ID: 19574911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Goldmann applanation tonometry after myopic photorefractive keratectomy.
Rosa N; Cennamo G; Breve MA; La Rana A
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Oct; 76(5):550-4. PubMed ID: 9826038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
